Gikeiki

by

Yoshitsune’s Treasure Trove of Knowledge ~ Part 2

Here’s part 2 of our discussion on Minamoto no Yoshitsune, and the continuation on analyzing his skills and techniques. A bigger conversation than his sword fighting techniques or types of weapons owned falls on his iconic strategies used during his military career. Since the battles he and his followers took place in are seen as revolutionary and unsurpassable for it’s time, much attention has been placed on studying them. In fact, it can be said that they inspired other generals and strategists to follow in suit and use similar tactics throughout Japan’s history.

This article will cover the military tactics Yoshitsune used in actual war campaigns, as described in novels and memoirs from the past. Along with this will be writings that set the foundation of his prowess, as well as how other groups pay tribute to his tactics within their own methods.

HIGHLIGHTS OF YOSHITUNE’S TACTICS USED IN BATTLE

The following tactics are from Yoshitsune’s life experience through warring against the Taira clan. These have been recorded and retold through sources such as “Heike Monogatari” (平家物語), “Azuma Kagami” (吾妻鏡), and “Gikeiki” (義経記).

An artwork entitled, “Ichi-no-tani gosen Hiyodori-goe yori Suto-no-ura o miru zu” (一ノ谷合戦 ひよ鳥越より江戸の浦を見る図) Featured here is Yoshitsune and his group laying hidden, in preparation for an ambush. By Utagawa Kuniyoshi. From ukiyoe.com.
  • Ambushes & surprise attacks: An example of Yoshitsune relying on guerilla-style warfare can be seen during the battle at Ichi-no-tani (一ノ谷) in the 3rd month of 1184, where he and his army ambushed an already defeated Taira clan from a prior skirmish. While the opposition was descending down a rather steep side of a mountain heading towards the western coast to board their ships and regroup, Yoshitsune’s surprise attack was swift and unexpected, as he and his group hid in areas around the mountain that appeared untouched for ages, then storming out from these unexpected angles. He also incorporated fire attacks around the mountain, adding to the chaos. Caught off guard, the Taira clan retreated hastily down the cliff in an effort to escape and rushed to their ships, with those unfortunate either being slain by the ambush, or drowning to death.
  • Deception tactics: In the 2nd month of 1185, the Minamoto and Taira were set to go into battle against each other at Yashima (屋島). In preparations against the Taira’s much larger army whom tried to embark on the island quietly, Yoshitsune set ablaze the homes in a town called Furutakamatsu (古高松) not too far from the opposing side, and raised many white flags. This was all to make it seem that the Minamoto had a very large army of their own. The Taira force fell for this deception, causing them to retreat back to their boats and flee for their lives.
  • Advantageous retreats: During the 4th month of 1185, the Heike and Minamoto clashed in their final battle in the sea at Dan-no-Ura (壇ノ浦). Each side were locked in grueling fights while on small boats. At one point, Yoshitsune is challenged by the a fierce opponent named Taira no Noritsune (平教経), who makes his way onboard. Not taking the chance, Yoshitsune retreats by leaping from his boat onto another comrade’s boat. He supposedly repeated this until he gained enough distance from Noritsune, around 8 times. Along with putting distance between them, Yoshitsune forces Noritsune to venture deeper within the Minamoto side, if he chooses to follow. This amazing feat is nicknamed “Hassō Tobi” (八艘飛び), or “8-Boats Leaping”¹.
  • Breaking protocols of war: During the sea battle at Dan-no-Ura, the Taira forces used local oarsmen to pilot their small boats while the warriors focused on fighting as they closed in on the warriors of the Minamoto army, giving them the advantage. There was an unspoken rule to not attack non-combatants, which included oarsmen. However, Yoshitsune ordered his troops to aim for the oarsmen and shoot them dead with their bows. This order was carried out, eliminating Taira’s mobility, and forcing them to deal with the unyielding close quarter skills of the Minamoto force. This unethical tactical approach is nicknamed “Kinji Te” (禁じ手)².
An artwork showing Yoshitsune using his signature “Hassō Tobi” skill to leap away from his enemy. From a dice game featuring a collage of scenes from Yoshitsune’s life called “Yoshitsune Ichidai Kunkō Sugoroku (義経一代勲功双六). By Utagawa Yoshikazu. From Wikimedia Commons.

These four battlefield strategies are seen as not only revolutionary at the time of use, but they go against the grain in what was considered standardized, universally expected protocols when going into war. To many, Yoshitsune’s methods were seen as unrefined, barbaric, and dirty. Yet, they demonstrate an intellectual, free-minded approach that got the job done for the greater purpose. In the end, the strategies of Yoshitsune are said to have a strong influence on the development of warfare in Japan years after his death³.

THE SECRET CONTENTS OF TORA NO MAKI

A pic of a large scroll of Tora no maki. First part, featuring a “Tenbatsu Reibun” (天罰礼文), a promissory note to uphold the contents, or face divine punishment.

Another highly acclaimed source of knowledge goes to one called “Tora no maki” (虎の巻)⁴. This is said to be a documentation of important methods for success. While this is normally referenced to while speaking about Minamoto no Yoshitsune, there are some points that need a bit of clarity, not only to get the full picture of this secret knowledge, but to properly understand which of these is being referenced. There are actually two Tora no maki documents that are connected to him, one while he was at Kurama Temple, and another after his accomplishments.

#1. Yoshitsune’s Secret Teachings on War Strategies

Let’s talk about the one that comes after his success as a general first. A documentation bearing numerous titles including “Yoshitsune Tora no Maki” (義経虎の巻), and “Hyōhō Tora no Maki” (兵法虎の巻)⁵, this documentation has a great emphasis on esoteric methods such as the use of Kuji no hō (九字の法) and Jūji (十字). To elaborate further, Kuji no hō, or “9-Hand Seals”, is a method of energy-attuning through the use of 9-syllable mudras and mantras, while Jūji, or “10th-Seal” is a tenth component of this method to activate the desired result. These are methods widely associated with Mikkyō (密教) and Shugendō (修験道), both a form of esoteric Buddhism, while different groups have made use of these methods, which includes military commanders, strategists, and practitioners of ninjutsu.

The ritualistic methods of using Kuji no hō is for the sake of protection, as well as preparing for battle that coincides with how the Japanese fought battles around the Kamakura period. This is explained in different sections regarding a multitude of situations one can face and how to handle them. Here are some of them.

  • 軍場出作法事 = Preparations for heading out to the battlefield
  • 敵打行時酒飲作法之叓 = Performing a sake ritual when leaving to eradicate the enemy
  • 軍神送時聲作ル作法事 = How to evoke protection from the God of War
  • 甲冑箭不融秘術之事 = Secret method for making one’s armor arrow-proof
  • 魔録者切秘術之叓 = The enchantment done by the conjuror
  • 神道弓作事 = Secret technique for crafting a Shintō bow

There are numerous versions of this particular Tora no maki, with no indication as to which is the original version. Many of them are replicas of another, and distributed for different purposes. Can the contents of this Tora no maki truly be linked to Yoshitsune? This is one area I can’t give a definitive answer, but due to its popularity, many have viewed this as valuable enough to want to collect and learn from.

From the pages of “Yoshitsune no Tora no maki – Hyōhō Hijutsu” (義経虎巻 兵法秘術), which features descriptions on how to handle varying situations, and ending with mantras that are accompanied with hand seals (left). Also included are arranging specific environments for the sake of auspicious practices (right).

#2. The Tiger Strategy book

The next type of of Tora no Maki is the one that originated from China, and which came into Yoshitsune’s hands through Kiichi Hōgen, one of his teachers at Kurama Temple. This is not its official label, nor is it a single documentation of its own; rather, it is like a volume from a larger documentation called simply “Rikutō” (六韜)⁶, or ” Six Secret Teachings” in English. The author of this is Jiang Ziya, a figure who was hailed as being a wise and talented general during the Zhou Dynasty. It is often identified as part of an important collection of Chinese-developed classical war stratagems, which includes the military text by Sun Tzu’s widely known as “Art of War”, and the thesis on civil, political, and war strategies known as “Thirty-Six Stratagems”. In the Six Secret Teachings, there are 6 books, so to speak, that make it a complete package.

  • 文韜 = Civil Strategy
  • 武韜 = Military Strategy
  • 龍韜 = Dragon Strategy
  • 虎韜 = Tiger Strategy
  • 豹韜 = Leopard Strategy
  • 犬韜 = Dog Strategy

Each book covers a vast amount of topics, from the perspective of Jiang Ziya taking the role as an advisor to King Wen, who would ask about various topics of concern, then receiving advice with great insight. These topics were compiled and centered around a specific theme that makes up each book. The Tiger Strategy book, or Tiger book for short, covers scenarios concerning war and combat. The following are the topics in the Tiger book, along with a brief outline of their contents.

  • 軍用 = Inventory of your army’s weapons and tools
  • 三陳 = Three battle formations
  • 疾戦 = Swiftly surrounding the opposition
  • 必出 = Escaping an enemy’s encirclement
  • 軍略 = Strategies on army deployment
  • 臨鏡 = Skirmishes within another territory’s borders
  • 動静 = Halting an enemy’s covert actions after gathering intel
  • 金鼓 = Knowing when to advance and retreat (nicknamed “utilizing war gongs and drums”)
  • 絶道 = Tactics when communications have been cut off
  • 略地 = Territorial invasion
  • 火戦 = Military prowess through the use of fire
  • 壘虚 = Uncovering the specifics about the enemy’s encampment

To summarize the Tiger book, it closely covers tactics on the battlefield, from understanding one’s own strengths, use of guerilla warfare, performing fast maneuvers with an army, to using fire attacks. Yoshitsune’s battlefield tactics closely resembles what is discussed in this book, thus thought to be the prime inspiration for his style of fighting, and in turn, making his campaigns very successful. Although part of a bigger collection, since the topics of the Tiger book focuses solely on military prowess and going into battle, it actually can be a stand-alone in its own rights.

Pic of the 1st pages in the Tiger Strategy section from the Six Secret Teachings, written in Chinese.

How did such a foreign writing get associated with Yoshitsune? First, we must understand that many cultural influences were brought over from China for several centuries during Japan’s prehistoric times. Although this would slow down at some point, literature from China, including documents on war, would continue to be a source of interest as Japan became more enthralled in war and conflict during the Heian and Kamakura periods. However, something like the Six Secret Teachings was a scarce material, only accessible by few of high status, or those who had some form of connection with those who make the journey to trade with China. Kiichi is portrayed as not your ordinary monk, and probably had connections in order to gain a copy of the Six Secret Teachings…or maybe just the Tiger book?

In historical chronicles like Gikeiki, it’s explained that Yoshitsune was able to read the Tiger book behind Kiichi’s back⁷. So, it’s possible that this was the only volume that Kiichi possessed…or maybe he did have all 6 books, but the most interesting one to Yoshitsune was the Tiger book?

MEANING BEHIND USING THE “YOSHITSUNE” LABEL

Let’s revisit the phenomenon where tribute to Minamoto no Yoshitsune’s legacy is given through concepts compiled and passed down as a form of working method. One of the more obvious representations of this can be found in particular martial arts styles that use the name “Yoshitsune” in their title.

Pics of the cover of “Iga Nin Hi no kan” (いが忍火之巻) (left), and a page describing a torch-like device called “Yoshitsune no Hi” (義経火) (right).

Outside of Yoshitsune Tora no maki and the many versions out there with similar contents, these martial arts styles have scrolls, manuscripts, and the like with listings of skills and/or techniques for combat, or “secret” teachings. Many of these styles are shitsuden (失伝), which means they are no longer active due to no current successor, indicating the lineage has ended. Are the contents genuinely linked to him? It is hard to say yes. While there are those that are paying recognition to his skills and tactics, there are others that use his name just to bolster the image of their style. This isn’t unusual, for this became a common practice from the Edo period onward.

Let’s take one, titled “Yoshitsune ryū Jūjutsu” (義経流柔術). This manual was written around the Edo period, and comes from the collection of the late Tokugawa Muneyoshi, a 2nd Lieutenant of the Imperial Japanese Army. Outside of the standard hand-to-hand fighting and grappling techniques, from what I understand, there were unique training methods within this style, which includes developing strong & agile legs through jumping out from a deep hole in the ground. As special as this sounds, it’s actually a focus many other jūjutsu systems adopted, even around the same time. Being a hand-to-hand system, it’s safe to say that Yoshitsune ryū Jūjutsu has no real connection to Yoshitsune. Is it just a case where this system has “Yoshitsune” tagged in the title to attract attention? Possibly so. However, it is also thought that this system was inspired by the many heroic tales of Yoshitsune and how he handled opponents with swift movements, which may have influenced this style to go in the same direction with their fighting techniques…or at least stand out amongst other jūjutsu schools.

Pics from Mansenshukai (満川集海), vol. 21 entitled, “Ninki” (忍器) (left). On page 15, a fire technique called “Yoshitsune Mizu Kagari-bi” (義経水炬火) (right).

There are also those documents that are military/wartime-centric, where the focus is on larger environments and combat against groups and survival are of greater importance. The types of documents, whether in the form of manuals or scrolls, pay tribute to Yoshitsune’s fighting methods by simply referring to it.

Let’s take “Mansenshukai” (満川集海) as an example. Being a renown collection of skills and teachings associated with ninjutsu, there are a few techniques that are tributed to Yoshitsune. There’s one called “Yoshitsune Mizu Kagari-bi” (義経水炬火), which is a special torch used in water environments. Another document is “Iga Kajutsu no maki” (伊賀火術の巻), which is a ninjutsu manual possessing a collection of skills used by those from the Iga region. Here, we see a technique called “Yoshitsune no Hi” (義経火), which is described as a form of handheld torch. Manuals like these that have skills concerning fire seem to have been inspired by the strategies used by Yoshitsune and his followers during battles against the Taira clan. This includes a particular impromptu skirmish at Mikusayama, Harima Province⁸ in 1184, where Yoshitsune devised torches which were used by him and his followers to set ablaze the fields and the shrubbery around a nearby mountain to not only halt Taira troops that were moving at night to group up, but foil them from amassing into a large army that would have otherwise overwhelm the Minamoto force if they clashed the following day⁹.

CONCLUSION

We come to the end on this 2-part series on Minamoto no Yoshitsune, and the numerous recorded combat knowledge that contribute to his legacy. With his life experiences and the tools used recorded within the pages of history, and expanded on as new information is uncovered, there’s no slowing down in how he remains popular with each new generation…not just in Japan, but worldwide. It’s safe to say that having access to all this knowledge is a way of having a strong connection to this famous general, whether they were actually devised by him, or emulated from descriptions of his exploits.

1) Another thought is that he jumped a distance of about 8-boats length. Interpretation can go either way based on a few factors. For example, these boats the warriors were fighting on were small ones like skiffs, and not the size of ships. If we read into this and imagine Yoshitsune jumping a great distance to escape, while onlookers are dazzled by his great feat that they liken the jump distance to being able to cross over 8 small boats, then yes this could make sense. Still, the popular opinion is not the jump distance, but the agility to leap repeatedly from numerous boats, which shows great skills and endurance especially since Yoshitsune was wearing full armor.

2) This word is also used in competitive matches or games. Based on interpretation, Kinji Te can be translated as either “forbidden tactic” or “dirty move”.

3) It is said that, due to failing relations with his half brother Yoritomo after the Minamoto gained control over the Capital, Yoshitsune was forced to commit suicide after being overwhelmed by an unexpected attack and betrayed by Fujiwara no Yasuhira, an indivudual who swore to protect him. However, there are other claims that Yoshitsune actually escaped and survived, with one even stating he sailed out to Mongolia and changed his name to a famous conqueror Genghis Khan!

4) Tora no maki is an old word, but its meaning has evolved over the years. Originally it referred to secret teachings and methodologies concerning combat on a very large scale, such as on the battlefield. Over the centuries, the term was slowly being used for not just martial arts, but areas related to the arts and crafts as a whole, such as flower arrangement and the like. In modern times, Tora no maki evolved to also mean secret tips or hints to better a person in various fields, which is especially common in the educational field, where it is used to aid students in their studies, exams, and the like.

5) Pronounced “Liu Tao” in Chinese.

6) There are even those that are callled “Kiichi Hōgen Hyōhō Tora no maki” (鬼一法眼兵法虎之巻), “Kiichi Hōgen Sanryaku” (鬼一法眼三略), and other similar naming convention. Despite Yoshitsune’s teacher’s name is used here, for the most part, the contents are in line with other variants, although how they are presented may be written in a different format. A good example of this is the one kept at the temple Kuramadera. This can be viewed online here.

7) How Yoshitsune acquired the Tiger book differs between sources. One of the more interesting ones is how Yoshitsune was able to sway the daughter of Kiichi Hōgen to take the Tora no maki and deliver it to him in secret.

8) Present day Katōshi City, Hyōgo Prefecture.

9) As told in the 9th volume of Heike Monogatari, in the section entitled, “Mikusa no Gassen” (三草合戦).

by

Yoshitsune & Benkei’s 1st Encounter: Tracking down Facts out of Lore

Today’s article is sort of a pick up from the last one, where I spoke about Musashibō Benkei’s ōnaginata being a cultural asset. To reiterate, cultural assets are things that have value in a country’s culture, but may not necessarily match up in the form one would expect. Let’s look at this from another angle, taking a popular story of how the heroic Minamoto no Yoshitsune met the barbaric Musashibō Benkei. Though their first encounter was violent, they became loyal partners with Benkei becoming a retainer to Yoshitsune. Through this, a bridge claimed as where the encounter took place has become famous, and quite an important landmark that many individuals (both local and international visitors) travel to see.

Artwork depicting Yoshitsune (right) dueling with Benkei (left) on a bridge, entitled “Yoshitsune Ichidaiki no uchi Kyukai Gojō no hashi ni” (義経一代記之内 九回 五条の橋に). By Utagawa Hiroshige (歌川広重).

For stories of the past that seem bigger than life, do they always add up as being accurate? For today’s article, we will look at the specifics of this legendary story & how they play out in the geographical setting of Kyoto, then delve into this particular bridge in question and see how much it actually ties in to the fame it gets.

THE LORE

The backdrop of this popular lore is set in 12th century Japan during the late Heian period, and begins in the rich Capital city known today as Kyoto. For about a year, the warrior monk Benkei would approach anyone bearing a sword as they attempted to cross a particular bridge, and take it by force by challenging them to a fight. He was always successful, since he stood at a monstrous height and was equally as strong bearing a large naginata, for many individuals were powerless against him. However, this would come to an end when he met a small boy named Ushiwakamaru, who would later be renown under the name “Minamoto no Yoshitsune”¹.

Here’s a popular children’s folklore song based on the encounter, called ”Ushiwaka”, which sums up how the popular lore of the encounter plays out. To the left is the original Japanese text, while to the right is my English transliteration.

This folklore sets the acclaimed image of two warriors battling out on a bridge, which in turn contributed to a setting like this being a popular one for duels in many stories even today. While this lore is simple & easy to understand, it’s also surprising to know that this is not how their encounter took place! For the full story, we have to review the original text, which is called “Gikeiki” (義経記), or “The Records of Yoshitsune” in English. The Gikeiki is stated to be a very old war chronicle by an unknown author(s), which was compiled into 8 volumes during the Muromachi period in the 14th century, shortly after the real-life feud between the Taira clan and the Minamoto clan in the 12th century. Through this, not only do we learn that the fight took place in not one, but two locations, it’s also revealed that either one was not mentioned to be a bridge directly².

GOJŌ TENJIN SHRINE

In the Gikeiki, the encounter between Yoshitsune and Benkei can be found in the 3rd volume, recited in a chapter entitled, “Benkei rakuchū nite hito no tachi wo ubaitoru koto” (弁慶洛中にて人の太刀を奪ひ取る事, While on a bridge, Benkei takes other people’s swords). Here, they first meet each other not too far away from the Gojō Tenjin Shrine. The specifics of this is Benkei departed from this shrine and headed southward towards a pathway with earthen walls on either side within a residential area, and waited at the end of a waterway for his 1000th victim to walk along this route. He then caught a glimpse of Yoshitsune walking along this route as he crossed a waterway³, playing a flute. This route is significant as it was used by those who traveled to pay their respects at the Gojō Tenjin shrine, which is a real place located in the lower city area of Kyoto.

Pic of Gojō Tenjin shrine. From Wikipedia.

Is the Gojō Tenjin shrine where the famed battle takes place? Not really, as it is only half of it. According to the Gikeiki, after a brief scuffle, Yoshitsune demonstrated unexpected skills which would put his opponent on the back foot. Not prepared for the smaller Yoshitsune to be so overbearing, Benkei runs away.

KIYOMIZU-DERA

The final confrontation between Yoshitsune and Benkei concludes the following day. However, it did not take place on the Gojō bridge. Instead, the two warriors would meet⁴ and settle their dispute in front of a large gate of the temple called “Kiyomizu-dera”. This temple, too, has a claimed long history and still exists today in the Higashiyama District of the city area in Kyoto. Take note that as both Gojō Tenjin shirne and Kiyomizu-dera are in the city area, they aren’t too far away from each other. Distance-wise, they are about 30 mins apart by foot, separated by the Kamo river (more on this later).

Pic of the westward gate of Kiyomizu-dera. This is possibly the same area where Benkei and Yoshitsune met a 2nd time before resuming their fight. From Wikipedia.

The two would battle around the vicinity of the Kiyomizu-dera, where Yoshitsune, realizing his opponent’s potential, would lightly wound Benkei on the hand to prevent him from continuing the fight. Defeated, Yoshitsune offered him to pledge his allegiance and serve him. Weighing in on the pros and cons, Benkei agrees.

POTENTIAL HISTORICAL INACCURACIES

Going based on the Gikeiki, there’s no mention of Yoshitsune encountering Benkei on the Gojō bridge, or any bridge for that matter. So where did this idea come from? Does it even exist today? Just to be clear, there is mention of a bridge in the said chapter of the Gikeiki, for the chapter title indicates that Benkei does his dirty deed on a bridge. By default, he is synonymous with a bridge due to the trouble he stirs in Kyoto as he performs his task of acquiring 1000 swords. Yet, why does he not occupy this bridge for the 1000th victim, who would turn out to be Yoshitsune? Instead, after departing for Gojō Tenjin shrine, Benkei chooses to wait near a waterway…possibly leading to the Gojō bridge? Or, is it possible that their fight spilled all the way onto the Gojō bridge? What about during their 2nd encounter at Kiyomizu-dera? Distance is way too far, so logically they wouldn’t have concluded their battle on the bridge, right? This could just be a case of poor narration on the part of this unknown author, and failing to describe properly the fight being on the aforementioned bridge. Of course, there are other sources of this famed event that mention the Gojō bridge as the location where the two warriors met, but take note that they date much later than the Gikeiki.

Regarding this bridge in question, how do we track it down? In popular lore and other (later) adaptions of the lore (including in the form of song and theatrical performance), it is referred to as “Gojō no hashi”, but is officially called “Gojō Ōbashi” today. If we go by the latter, then yes there is a Gojō Ōbashi, which is a large bridge that sits over the Kamo river. It is geographically in the middle of Gojō Tenjin shrine and Kiyomizu-dera, albeit at an angle, and is an option of a path for those who would need to travel between both locations. However, this particular “bridge” cannot be the same one hinted in any of the sources, simply for the fact that it was not originally there at the time of the two warriors’ battle!…at least, not in the form we see it now.

Here is the Gojō bridge (bottom-left), portrayed with the temple Hōkōji (方広寺) in the artwork “Gojō hashi Daibutsuden Chōbō Zu” (五条橋大仏殿眺望図). By Maruyama Ōgyo (円山 応挙) sometime in the 18th century. To the right, a pic of the same bridge as it is in modern times. From Wikipedia.

Here’s a quick explanation to clear this up. Originally, this Gojō bridge was a short distance north from where it is now. In 1590, the shogun Toyotomi Hideyoshi had that bridge moved more southward in order to make processions to the temple Hōkōji (southwest of Kiyomizu-dera), which houses the largest statue of Buddha in Kyoto, more accessible. This is where the new Gojō bridge sits today. So, where was the old location? Researchers have estimated it to be where the current Matsubara bridge (松原橋, Matsubara hashi) is located, which is on the Matsubara tōri (松原通り), or “Matsubara street”. Guess it’s safe to say that while the location of the bridge is correct, apparently the specifics of the general area are a little off. Since it would’ve been the preferred route at the time, it aligns with the idea that Benkei was using this previous Gojō bridge (Matsubara bridge), and that he would’ve confronted Yoshitsune there (see illustration below as a reference).

In regards to potential inaccuracies concerning the 14th century text Gikeiki, this is to be expected for a couple of reasons. For starters, it is not unusual for locations that were mentioned in ancient text to not match up due to the development of cities and towns. In Japan’s case, this is even more of an issue, as certain key areas faced many changed due to whoever was in power at the time, usually a warlord, or by order of the shogun. It is not unusual for a bridge to be moved and renamed, but there are cases of villages, towns, and prefectures gaining new names or resized geographically. This poses as a challenge when trying to pinpoint places found in old documents that no longer exist. Another issue is in regards to the author of the text. While there is no author’s name specified, it is believed that the writing was heavily influenced by Buddhist monks. This isn’t unusual, for they were but few of specific groups that were literate, plus much of the contents for certain characters involved Buddhist practices that would take someone in the field to understand⁵. That being said, the original text, while slated to be a war chronicle based on true events, has its fair share of oddities that hint at agenda-driven ideas. In essence, these peculiar points could lead to such inaccuracies like not indicating properly whether a battle between two warriors indeed takes place on a bridge for the sake of highlighting places of worship.

This is an outline of the general area is Kyoto where the event takes place, as well as key locations mentioned in the story. The most important point to take from this is the location of the modern Gojō Ōbashi (Gojō Grand bridge) versus the previous Gojō bridge, now known as Matsubara hashi (Matsubara bridge).

On a related note, it is worth mentioning the naming convention “Gojō” is connected to the Gojō tōri, or “5th street” for simpler reading. As one would expect, the Gojō tōri is part of a numerical sequence of large streets that run through Kyoto, so there is an Ichijō tōri, (1st Street), Nijō tōri, (2nd Street), and so on. In turn, these same streets have their own matching bridges over the Kamo river. The Matsubara bridge, the former location of Gojō bridge, is geographically where Gojō tōri is said to have have been (present-day Matsubara tōri), which is one of the reasons for the name of the shrine Gojō Tenjin to have “Gojō” in it, as it sits near the edge of that former street (now called Matsubara tōri). Today, Gojō tōri runs along the same line as Gojō bridge…which seems to also be where Rokujō tōri is supposed to be.

CONCLUSION

In ending, certain aspects of history can make tangible things much more special, becoming intangible cultural icons. In the case of Yoshitsune and Benkei’s fated encounter, it’s been passed down as a lore that embraces the Gojō bridge as the stage for this. Being an old story, sometimes details don’t match up quite as well as they should, which can bring up questions, such as the accuracy the actual location. At the end of the day, it is best to see the modern day Gojō bridge as a tribute to the original location in my personal opinion. While there are perks to understanding the specifics, it shouldn’t deter a person from visiting this massive bridge and enjoy its visuals.

1) Historically famous under the title “Minamoto no Yoshitsune” as an adult. When he was younger, including the time of meeting Benkei, he went by the nickname “Ushiwakamaru”. To avoid confusion, we will primarily stick with his adult name for this article, where it applies.

2) There are a few other adaptations that cover this fated encounter as well, this including those interestingly entitled “Benkei Monogatari” (弁慶物語), “Hashi Benkei” (橋弁慶), and “Jisori Benkei” (じぞり弁慶). While all have their similarities, a few of them contain more info about Benkei, as well as some slight variations to how Yoshitsune and Benkei’s encounter unfolded, such as directly centering the Gojō bridge as the sole location where they would meet & conclude their battle.

3) This waterway points to the Kamo river, and may be the hint to Yoshitsune crossing over it by the Gojō bridge. Problem is, this is not actually stated in the Gikeiki, leading readers to assume this is the case. Note that this is an issue with the Gikeiki, and not necessarily a problem found in other sources covering Yoshitsune & Benkei’s fight.

4) In the Gikeiki, this is narrated as if this happened by chance. Benkei guesses that he would meet Yoshitsune at Kiyomizu-dera at night, and sure enough he appears. There is no indication that this is an arranged meeting, which is strange…or possibly the readers are to assumed that there was a clue hinting to the two agreeing to meet there…?

5) This is similar to the “Heike Monogatari” (平家物語), another historical text that covers the same events found in the Gikeiki, except more from the perspective of the Taira clan. While the author of the Heike Monogatari is unknown, it was told by monks in the form of verses for many generations.