The image of kōryu bujutsu, or traditional martial arts, is a collection of systems predating Edo period that are exclusive, with each bearing unique, signature methodology and techniques. While there’s some truth to this, the reality is that many of them were born from preceeding systems, so there will be some level of universal skills. This becomes even more apparent once Japan is unified under the Tokugawa shogunate, where there was more accessibility to studying multiple styles, cultural exchange between complying schools took place, and competitive meets between different schools became increasingly the norm. At some point, before the 1900s, most martial systems had a level of shared knowledge, with a separation through each respected schools’ methodology, approach, and history.
Recently I reviewed a post-Edo documentation that supports this movement. Bearing an unusually long title of “Enden ryū yari naginata, Sekiguchi ryū iai, Hōen ryū Heihō, dōryū iai, dōryū bō” (圓傳流鎗長刀 關口流居合 方圓流兵法 同流居合 同流棒), it’s a listing of specific techniques from Japanese martial systems that have become a standard of sorts as of 1841, which is the same date it was written. One can view this as a development according to the more social-bureacratic structure, where martial arts was interjected into society steadily in a form of recreation, giving it a purpose on a business level. This document covers certain techniques from a specific number of disciplines, including kenjutsu, sōjutsu, iai, and bōjutsu. What piqued my interest the most was the bōjutsu section, since there’s a great number of schools that have a bōjutsu curriculum, it’ll be fun to piece their similarities..
The the left, the cover of the documentation. To the right, the listing of standard bō techniques, found on page 13.
Today I want to go over this short list of techniques for bōjutsu that are pointed to as being standardized techniques. One of the challenges here includes understanding the technique listed by the name; while many systems may share the same technique by application on a fundamental level, it is not uncommon for the technique to bear different names.
Jōdan (上段)
While this is a common term for something that is high, as an upper stance or high strike, there are no details explaining which one is being referred to. So we will refer to jōdan uchi (上段打ち), jōdan uke (上段受け), and jōdan no kamae (上段の構え).
A demonstration of jōdan uchi
Jōdan uchi is simply a high strike, which all bōjutsu styles have as a standard. There are different ways to executing this based on one’s posture, technique, and situation. Jōdan uke shares many similarities in terms of mechanics, and is applied in a similar motion.
An example of jōdan no kamae
The posture jōdan no kamae has a portion of the bō held above head height. Of course, this can vary greatly between schools based on appearance, philosophy, and application. This doesn’t include the myriad of variations that accompany this posture. What holds true, however, is the fact that all schools have a jōdan no kamae, even if it is not named this¹.
Gedan (下段)
Just like jōdan, gedan (下段) is a common name for something that is low or down. In martial arts, it is used to distinguish low attacks and blocks, as well as lower postures. Gedan uchi (下段打ち) is a strike generally aimed at a low target, such as the legs. There are very few variations to this, making it a simple technique to execute from any posture. Gedan uke (下段受け), or lower block, shares a similar motion.
Examples of gedan no kamae
Looking at the posture gedan no kamae (下段の構え), this is an emphasis of one end, or the entirety, of the bō low close to the ground. Different variations have the portion held close to the ground either position in front or behind. Since this is a standard posture, there are schools that stick with the name as-is, but it’s not uncommon for other names to be used.
Koshi guruma (腰車)
This is a technique where the bō is held near or behind the hip, and is then swung in a large, sweeping arc. A rather large attack, it is also very strong. While in some instructions the targeting area may be mentioned being the opponent’s chest or hip, realisitically it can target just about anywhere.
Demonstration of a version of koshi guruma in motion
Koshi guruma is not posture-specific, but instead emphasizes utilizing the bō attached to the hip. Of course, this opens the door for some postures to transition into this much easier than others, including those where the back end of the bō is held lower to the ground, or the bō is whirled from behind the back.
Kasa no shita (笠下)
The name kasa no shita literally translates to “under the umbrella”. The bō is held horizontal around shoulder level , either from the front or behind. From my experience, this is a technique that tends to deal with a attack from underneath in a raising manner, or swung to the front in a sweeping manner if held from
Demonstration of a version of kasa no uchi in motion
From my understanding, there is right or wrong when comparing kasa no shita being done from the front or behind, as both are situational. Of course, certain systems my emphasize one over the other according to their methodology.
Mizuhiki (水引)
This technique is an interesting one. While some other modern references mention about it being a common one for many bojutsu systems, it’s a name I’ve not seen much of, nor is the name itself assuming. Visually I am able to discern this as a standard technique that can be found in many schools, whether as a focused one within a kata or just a stand-alone one.
Demonstration of a version of mizuhiki in motion
Mizuhiki involves the bō aimmed upwards from a crouching position, attacking the opponent’s hands from below. Looking beyond the idea of technique, Mizuhiki represents the strategy of being able to use the bō from a crouching position. One may find themselves needing to swing their bō from a low position whether intentionally or through circumstance.
Kurai (位)
The term kurai refers to manipulating the bō based on the situation. This means one wields it dynamically. In some ways, it is like assuming a kamae. This is an older label that hints more on strategic use of positions and how they directly influence the way of holding the bō.
As an example, if you are facing off against an opponent on a hill and you have the high ground, it would be more natural to take up a gedan no kamae where the bō is held in the front, so to attack & control the opposition much easier. On the opposite side of the coin, if you are on the lower part of the hill, then there is a higher probability that seigan no kamae will be the more effective posture.
Since the concept of kurai is so open-ended based on how each bōjutsu system’s methodolgy is structured, there are no set postures to represent this.
While small and concise, this document can contribute as research material to understanding the development of Japanese martial arts during the 1800s when paired with other sources. Of course it is not perfect, as this is from one person’s (or group of people) perspective, while we do not get any info as to why these techniques are chosen as being standard amongst most bōjutsu systems. Still, this gives some food for thought for those who want to compare the similarities and differences between Japanese martial systems.
1) It was common practice to conceal aspects of one’s style in the past. Sometimes this included naming a technique in an inconspicuous way, making it difficult to know what it is unless demonstrated and explained in person. While sharing of information between martial arts schools is much more abundant in modern times, there are still some styles today that uphold a level of secrecy.
Here is the 5th part of the ongoing series on the Tenga Goken, or the 5 great swords of Japan. Each of these swords has a unique trait that defines its existence as a masterpiece in its own respect. In the case of the Dōjigiri Yasutsuna (童子切安綱), it is not only deemed as the oldest sword, but its beginnings come literally straight out of a fairytale.
Let’s take a look at its details:
A pic of the Dōjigiri Yasutsuna on display. From Wikipedia.
Status: national treasure
Maker: Yasutsuna
Blade length: 80 cm
Blade curvature: 2.7 cm
Blade base width: 2.9 cm
Blade tip width: 1.9 cm
Length of back of blade: 3.1 cm
There is a great amount of documentation for it over the centuries. Much of these are related to inventory reports, and various accounts by owners and their associates. Others are story-like accounts related to the sword, with some more believable than others. This high documentation is in thanks to the Dōjigiri always in the possession of some high profile groups, along with a few sword enthusiasts. Today, it is in the care of Tokyo National Museum, as it is part of their National Institutes for Cultural Heritage collection.
For this article, we’ll cover more of the relevant recordings, along with some noteworthy ones that play into the theme of the Tenga Goken.
YASUTSUNA
The swordsmith name on the sword’s tang is “Yasutsuna” (安綱). This points to Ōhara Yasutsuna, who was active in Hōki country (present-day western part of Tottori prefecture) during the early Heian period from 806 to 810. This area was known to be rich in pure iron sand, which was essential material for sword crafting. The style of crafting of the Dojigiri also matches with the Heian period, such as the curvature of the blade. With these strong evidences, it is estimated as the oldest sword out of the Tenga Goken.
Surviving records such as Chōkyō Meizukushi (長享銘尽) point to Aimi county in Hōki country as where he was living. On paper, Yasutsuna is considered as one of Japan’s most recognized swordsmith from far ancient times.
YORIMITSU VS SHUTEN DŌJI
A drawing of Minamoto no Yorimitsu, from the 10-volume artwork collection “Zenken Kojitsu” (前賢故実), from the Edehon Database. By Kikuchi Yōsai.
The Dōjigiri’s existence is introduced to the world through a popular tale about Minamoto no Yorimitsu (源頼光) and his bravery. Hailing from the famous Minamoto line, Yorimitsu was, according to surviving records, a real person who lived from 948 from 1021. Curiously, the tales about him and his companions include mythical and superstitious events, which is not uncommon considering the times. There is one particular event where Yorimitsu must play the hero as he was tasked to slay a notorious demon, which is where the Dōjigiri comes into the picture. Here’s a synopsis of how that story goes.
In in they year of 995, the Imperial court tasked Minamoto no Yorimitsu (源頼光) with pacifying a gang of demons lead by a mighty ogre called Shuten Dōji. These criminals have done many heinous acts, including kidnapped women from villages to be eaten later. Yorimitsu set out with 4 of his most trusted retainers dubbed Shitennō (四天王, 4 Heavenly Kings)¹, and traveled the demons’ lair, which was on Mount Daie in Tanba country (present-day area between Kyōto and Hyōgo prefecture).
A woodblock called “Yorimitsu-chōshin Shuten Dōji wo taiji no zu” (頼光朝臣酒呑童子ォ退治之図), featuring Yorimitsu and the Shitennō engaging with the notorious demon gang. This scene includes Shuten Dōji tied with chains while Yorimitsu beheads him, but in a fit the head takes flight and attacks Yorimitsu. By Katsukawa Shuntei.
On their way, they met 3 wise men who gave them items that would aid in defeating the demons. This included a special wine called “shinbenki dokushu” (神便鬼毒酒), which was interpreted as a “divinely conceived poisonous wine for demons”, yet had healing properties for humans². Disguising themselves as mountain ascetics, Yorimitsu and his team were able to deceive the demons in order to gain entry into their lair, and as a thanks to their hospitality, entertained their hosts through dance and wine. After drinking the wine, Shuten Dōji and his gang fell asleep from its neutralizing effects. Seizing the chance, Yorimitsu drew his concealed sword and beheaded Shuten Dōji, while the rest of his team fought off and slew the other demons. Taking the demon leader’s head as a trophy, and freeing the captives, Yorimitsu & his crew returned back to the Imperial court in the Capital³ where they received many honors.
It’s from this episode where the name “Dōjigiri” comes from.
Minamoto no Yorimitsu is recorded as a historical figure who truly did exist. Was the journey he embarked on real? Was Shuten Dōji an actual demon? There are many layers to this story, and the other versions that mirror it, which would need its own article to properly analyze it.
As for Dōjigiri, because it comes from the lore of being sharp enough to behead a mighty demon, is where it gets its name. As an heirloom of the Minamoto clan, it makes sense that Yorimitsu would gain possession of it. Yet, how and from whom the Minamoto family acquired this sword is not explained.
POSSESSION OF THE MATSUDAIRA FAMILY
After Yorimitsu, the Dōjigiri is passed into the the hands of several high profile individuals, with the first being the Ashikaga family. There is no clear explanation on how this happened, but estimated time is between late 900s to early 1000s. As an elite military family with status through the Imperial court, the Ashikaga family added the Dōjigiri to their growing collection of valuable treasures, and it would remain there for a few centuries even after their family claimed shogunate in the early-mid 1300s.
In the late 1500s the 15th shogun Ashikaga Yoshiaki gave the sword to Toyotomi Hideyoshi. A superstitious man, Hideyoshi was not pleased to keep a sword with such a history⁴. So he passed it to the Honami family for safe keeping. It’s possible that from this point the Dōjigiri was evaluated, and the name of the swordsmith was discovered. At a later date, Hideyoshi then parted with the sword as he gave it to Tokugawa Ieyasu. After becoming shogun and establishing total control over Japan, Ieyasu gave the Dōjigiri to his son, Hidetada.
An artwrk of Matsudaira Tadanao. From Wikipedia.
On a celebratory day in November of 1611, Hidetada’s daughter Katsuhime was be-wedded to Matsudaira Tadanao, a lord of Kita-no-Sho Domain in Echizen country. Hidetada gave the Dōjigiri to Tadanao as a gift in honor of their family’s unity; while the Tokugawa name was reputable at this point, the same can be said for the Matsudaira mainly due to their long established line, as well as historical connection with the Tokugawa line. The latter saw tremendous benefits, for once the Tokugawa Shogunate was established, this gave opportunities for the Matsudaira families to be positioned as lords over numerous lands. While Tadanao was bringing his land in Echizen country into this unison, Katsuhime’s family was bringing their Takada domain, which was located in Echigo country⁵.
After relinquishing his duties due to old age and retiring into priesthood⁶, Tadanao had his 8-year old son, Mitsunaga, in line to take over the the Kita-no-Sho domain. When he came of age, Mitsunaga would instead became lord of the Takada domain in Echigo country due to political issues. From this point, the Dōjigiri, along with other treasured items of his father, would be left to him.
The Dōjigiri remained as a Matsudaira treasure for several centuries, up until modern time⁷. There were a few cases where it passed into other hands, due to land ownership issues. During those cases, where it was on the land that was up for redistribution, the Dōjigiri ended up on the assets assessment lists drafted up. This made this particular sword well documented, and easily tracked. In 1933, it was appointed as a national treasure by the Ministry of Education (文部省, Monbushō) under the old system. It was also present in the Yūshūkan Sword Exhibition in 1940.
THE PRICE OF BIG SPENDING AND DEBT
Starting around the early 1940s, the Dōjigiri finally leaves the possession of the Matsudaira family, as it would get caught in a power struggle by those willing to pay a hefty price for it. This first went into motion as a Nakajima Kiyoichi had his eyes set on purchasing the Dōjigiri from the Matsudaira family. He made a request to Ishigurō Kuro, a renown sword dealer from Ishikawa prefecture, to see if he could buy it straight from the prestigious owners. At the time, Kuro made attempts, initially purchasing 2 different swords. It wouldn’t be until 1946 when he was finally successful in securing the Dōjigiri, paying ¥80,000⁸ for it. When Kuro reached out to his client to come and buy the sword from him, it seemed as if the deal was gonna go sour, for Kiyoichi didn’t have the money for it.
Reaching out to the Honami family for help, Kiyoichi used their connections to find a business man name Tamari Sannosuke, who was willing to lend money. Sannosuke paid Kuro ¥100,000 for the Dōjigiri. Having such an exclusive sword, Sannosuke relieved the flustered client from being in his debt by offering to take care of the sword. While in his possession, the Dōjigiri was re-evaluated and once again appointed as a national treasure under the new system.
In the mid 1900s, the Dōjigiri was associated to large sums of money, as individuals invested a great amount to get their hands on it. From Photo-AC.
Some drama would unfold a little later, where Sannosuke’s business went bankrupt. He made several attempts to borrow money using the sword, including transferring the sword to a Mr. Murayama for safe keeping and financial support. In 1950, a sword enthusiast named Watanabe Saburō heard about this and contacted Mr. Murayama, as he was willing to pay ¥500,000 as a lending fee, in which Sannosuke agreed. However, several months later into the new year of 1951, Saburō passed away. Sannosuke, who felt that their deal was void due to the death, reached out to the Watanabe family to send back the money and have the Dōjigiri returned to him. As this didn’t go as smoothly as anticipated, both sides would have to try and resolve the matter in court, which spanned for almost a decade.
In 1963, a resolution to end the fight over ownership for the Dōjigiri was made by a member from the Bunkazai Hogoiinkai (文化財保護委員会, National Commission for Protection of Cultural Properties), who would buy the sword completely by paying a hefty price of ¥26,300,000. This amount was split at a specific rate between ¥20,000,000 for Sannosuke, and ¥6,000,000 for the Watanabe family.
With the Dōjigiri in the possession of the Bunkazai Hogoiinkai, it was free from the bidding wars of sword enthusiasts. It was eventually donated to the Tokyo National Museum, where it can be put up on display in exhibits for the public to see.
FUN FACTS
As mentioned earlier, there is an abundant amount of writings on the Dōjigiri, some more interesting than others. While this sword has had its fair share of territorial and ownership disputes, there are a good amount of stories claiming unusual events. Then there are those that are heresay, and can be viewed as baseless rumors or fantasy. Below are a select few that give different perspectives in which how this special sword was interacted with.
1. MORE THAN ONE DEMON-SLAYING SWORD?
As with most old stories from Japan’s ancient times, there are different versions to the famed story of Minamoto no Yorimitsu and his quest to quell Shuten Dōji. The differences vary, from the names used to identify certain individuals, the appearances of certain individuals, to certain details included to give more wilder context (i.e Shuten Dōji’s flying head after decapitation). Fortunately, all these versions share the core parts, which includes Yorimitsu, his loyal followers, Shuten Dōji and his gang at their layer, and the wine that weakened Shuten Dōji enough where Yorimitsu was able to behead him with a sword.
An artwork entitled ” Ichijo Modori bashi no atari nite Higegirimaru no tachi wo motte Ibaraki Dōji no ude wo kiru” (一條戻り橋の邉にて髭切丸の太刀を以茨鬼童子の腕を斬). Watanabe no Tsuna is shown about to cut off the arm of Ibaraki Dōji as they engage in a struggle on the Ichijo Modori bridge. By Utagawa Kuniyoshi.
These differences also affect the representation of Dōjigiri, for while it sounds like this was the key item to Yorimitsu’s victory, there tends to be mentioned of 2 other swords, which are the Onigiri (鬼切) and Higegiri (髭切). Depending on the source, Dōjigiri may be omitted and replaced by one of these 2 other swords, or they appear in the same story but used to fulfill a different task. Here’s an explanation about these other 2 swords:
Onigiri – It’s name can be interpreted as, for the sake of popularity, “Demon-Slayer”. However, its full title is stated as either “Onigirimaru” (鬼切丸) or “Onigiri Yasutsuna” (鬼切安綱). It is argued that the Onigiri is another sword in Yorimitsu’s possession, an heirloom of sorts passed down his family line. In few sources the name “Onigiri” is stated as the sword used to slay Shuten Dōji. Or, that the Dōjigiri’s name was changed to “Onigiri” after the task was done. However, neither are correct. In reality, this sword exists in its own respect, as it is kept as a valuable cultural treasure at the shrine Kitano Tenmangu in Kyōto. Furthermore, the maker’s name on the sword tang is supposedly Yasutsuna, meaning that it and the Dōjigiri are siblings, so to speak.
Despite its existence, there are some oddities surrounding it, leading to questions including the legitimacy as a Yasutsuna-crafted sword. On another note, this is the same sword as the Higegiri. More on this below.
Higegiri – Its name translating as “Whisker-Splitter”, this is another sword that was wielded for the sake of pacifying demons. Origin is that it was a treasured sword of the Minamoto clan, and got its name when it was used to behead a criminal, cutting clean not only through the neck, but the hairs from his beard as well. After their task of ridding Shuten Dōji and his gang, Minamoto no Yorimitsu lent this sword to his retainer Watanabe no Tsuna (渡辺綱) as he went to investigate some troubles in the Capital. As he headed there on horseback, he encountered a woman in distress at a bridge called “Ichijo Modori” (一条通り). Watanabe gave her a hand and lifted her up to sit behind him on his horse, when moments later she transformed into a demon known as Ibaraki Dōji (茨木童子) and grabbed the warrior. A sworn brother of Shuten Dōji, he had escaped from Mt. Daie when Yorimitsu and his retainers terminated his brethrens, and was now attempting to get revenge. Drawing the Higegiri out quickly, Watanabe seized the demon’s right arm, and cut upwards, slicing the arm clean off. After this episode, its name was changed to “Onigiri”.
This sword still exists, as mentioned above, for it is at the shrine Kitano Tenmangu in Kyōto, where it is kept as a cultural treasure. Since the Higegiri is the same sword as the Onigiri, it shares the same discrepancies, as there are questions regarding the legitimacy of its story and other details.
2. OUTRANKING MASAMUNE
Towards the ending of the 1600s, the Matsudaira family who owned Tsuyama Domain in Sakushu (present-day northern part of Okayama Prefecture) gained possession of the Dōjigiri. They also owned 2 other high-quality swords, one was “Inabagō” (稲葉郷) and the other was “Ishida Masamune” (石田正宗).
A pic of the Ishida Masamune on display. From Wikipedia.
All three swords are expertly crafted and high quality. The Ishida Masamune also has an impressive backstory, especially as it is one from the famed Masamune line known for its unrivaled sharpness. Yet, when a member of the Honami family had a chance to evaluate both swords, the Dōjiri was judged to be the better sword.
3. GUARDIAN FOXES
By lore and superstition, there are creatures used as messengers of the gods known as shinshi (神使) in Japan. These creatures existed for the sake of serving or protecting things that are special one way or the other. They are said to take the form of common animals, reptiles, and amphibians, with one of the more popular one being a fox.
There is another tale from Tsuyama Domain’s Matsudaira family, which is said to take place around the same time as the one previously mentioned above. One day, the Dōjigiri was sent out to be delivered for evaluation to Honami Saburobei’s home in Hirokouji, Ueno (an area in present-day Tokyo). While crossing the Sujikai Bridge (筋違橋) on the way to Saburobei’s home, it is said that there were foxes that came out and approached the individual with the Dōjigiri. There was no interaction with the foxes, just their sudden appearance and their momentary company down the same road, until they finally made their way towards a path to Yanaka in Ueno.
The take from this story is that these foxes acted as shinshi, and came to assist in guiding the Dōjigiri safely to its destination.
4. KATSUHIME’S SAYAGAKI
Starting around the late 1500s was a practice called “sayagaki” (鞘書き) through the permission of Toyotomi Hideyoshi, with the particulars including a person writing on the shirasaya of a reputable sword that is generally placed in storage. Swords that will not be used, or to help preserve during the humid summer, have their normal fittings taken off, and are placed in a simple wooden sheath with an equal simple wooden sword handle. A peculiar practice, it allowed details about the sword to be written on the sheath without the need to draw it out.
An example of sayagaki.
In 1623, the Dōjigiri was stored in shirasaya while it, along with other properties, was under the ownership of Katsuhime until her son was old enough to inherit them. There was sayagaki on the sheath of the Dōjigiri, and it is thought to have been done by Katsuhime herself, based on the writing style at that time.
This is what was written on the shirasaya of the Dojigiri:
JAPANESE: 表 童子切貳尺六寸五分 裏 鎺元ニテ壹寸横手下ニテ六分半重子厚サ貳分
ENGLISH: Front: Dōjigiri, measuring at 2 shaku 6 sun 5 bu Back: There is a hole measuring 1 sun at the base of the habaki (鎺, metal collar between the sword and the hand guard), 6 1/2 bu line below the yokote (横手, line on the side of the blade between the tipe and the cutting edge), with a thickness of 2 bu
There is a description about these lines and how it is judged to be written by a woman, most likely Katsuhime. However, I am not sure who made this judgement.
5. EAST VS WEST
Within Asian culture there is a rather unique labeling of 2 things that are considered equal in strength and quality. Influenced by the ying-yang theory, these 2 things stand side-by-side and represent balance, even if both objects are rivals or mortal enemies.
Amongst sword enthusiasts, there is a statement that declares both the Dōjigiri and another sword called Ōkanehira (大包平) as equals. The line goes as follows:
“日本刀の東西の両横綱”
This translates to “Japan’s best 2 swords from the East and the West”. The East-West comparison is due to the fact that the Dōjigiri was crafted in Hōki country, which is located in western Japan, while the Ōkanehira was made in Bizen country⁹, located in eastern Japan. Looking at the history of the Ōkanehira, it was made during the late Heian period by an individual known as “Kanehira”, who belonged to the swordsmith group called “Ko-Bizen” (古備前). Like the Dōjigiri, the style of the Ōkanehira is stated as exquisite, as it has unique qualities matching the era it was crafted.
The reasoning behind this assertion points to how old both swords are estimated to be, for they have survived centuries up until present day.
6. CUTTING TEST
Sometime around the ending of the 1600s during the Edo period, the sharpness of the Dōjigiri was put to the test. While the sword was still in the possession of the Matsudaira family of Tsuyama Domain, there was a request to test just how strong it was. This event was set up as a “tameshigiri”, or “test cutting”, where an attempt would be made to cut through as many human bodies with the Dōjigiri in one swing. Not an unusual practice, tameshigiri was a means to evaluate the cutting power of swords of all types, and rate them by the number of targets they are able to cleave through…with the targets being close to or being exactly that of the human body. In the case of the Dōjigiri, the dead bodies of criminals were used.
A reputable swordsman within the area by the name of Machida Chōdayū (町田長太夫), who was a renown expert at tameshigiri, was given the task of testing this legendary sword’s sharpness. At its finest moment, Chōdayuu was able to completely slice through not only 6 dead bodies in one motion while wielding the Dōjigiri, but also split in half the mat the bodies were laid on.
ENDING
A great deal was shared about the Dōjigiri and it reputation as a special sword both in application, design, and value. All of this documentation and events are what elevate it to a high-profile sword. That covers everything worth mentioning about the Dōjigiri Yasutsuna, illustrating why it is categorized as one of the Tenga Goken. Be on the look out for the last article in this series, which will be on the Odenta Mitsuyo.
1) While Shitennō literally means “4 Heavenly Kings”, in most cases it is a label reserved to 4 very strong & talented individuals. Think of it as 4 pillars to an establishment or group. For Yorimitsu’s group, these 4 individuals were Watanabe no Tsuna (渡辺綱), Sakata no Kintoki (坂田金時), Usui Sadamitsu (碓井貞光), and Urabe Suetake (卜部季武). The other nickname commonly used is “Raikō Shitennō” (頼光四天王), with “Raiko” being the onyomi (音読み, Chinese-phonetic) reading of “Yorimitsu”, which was an old practice usually done in honor of someone important or famous.
2) When drank by humans, the pronunciation of the name of this sake is the same, but instead uses the kanji “神変奇特酒” . This version of the name reads something like “mysteriously special wine of the Gods “.
3) Actually, Yorimitsu was not able to bring Shuten Dōji’s head back to the Imperial court, as it became “heavy” and unyielding on the way. This was forewarned while they passed through an area on the outskirts of the Capital that had a koyasu jizō (子安地蔵, statue of Jizō the guardian of childbirth) on the path, which warned them that no one was allowed to bring unclean things into the Capital city. It is thought that the guardian deity there caused this to protect the citizens, since Shuten Dōji was festered with germs, and it was highly possible his head would bring illnesses.
Having no other options, Yorimitsu dug up a tomb for the severed head, which would years later become the grounds for the shrine called Kubizuka Daimyōjin (首塚大明神). Consisting of a simple torii (gate), grave, and an altar, it is a small shrine where, through worshiping Shuten Dōji as a deity, all ailments the severed head was carrying has been lifted…at least, according to lore.
4) The same happened to the Onimaru Kunitsuna, which can be read here.
5) Katsuhime (勝姫) was more than a filler in the Tokugawa lineage; unlike many other women who have remained nameless, she is identified by her real name. This is due to her involvement in familial matters, which included land management and issues. Katsuhime is known under different titles during her lifetime, including the honorific title Takada-sama (高田様, Madame Takada), and her Buddhist name Tensuin (天崇院).
6) Life expectancy was low around this time, so it was not unusual for people to retire from their profession around their 40s or 50s.
7) To elaborate a little, it primarily remains in the possession of the Matsudaira from Tsuyama domain from 1698 up until modern times. Mitsunaga of the Matsudaira line from Echigo domain had a relatively long and intricately difficult time in his later years dealing with land ownership disputes with the Tokugawa Shogunate, which detracts too much with this article’s topic to go over. This also included losing ownership of treasured items temporarily, with the Dōjigiri being one of those possessions. These issues were eventually resolved while he was still alive, and he later had certain possessions, including the Dōjigiri, passed into the safe keeping of the Tsuyama-Matsudaira family line in a formal manner.
8) This, and all money values that follow are reported in Japanese yen, but not at present day’s rate. Note that there was not an official exchange rate of yen to US dollars from around the mid 1940s to to early 1950s. This is primarily due to Japan’s lack of a unified currency system in society as a whole, as well as that yen was not yet part of the Bretton Woods system regarding affiliated global exchange rates. This would slowly change starting around around 1952.
Due to the lack of currency value structure for the Japanese yen at the time when the Dōjigiri was being purchased, attempts at a dollar to yen conversion will fluctuate abit, leading to possible (but not guaranteed) estimates. As a starter, the conversion rate between the mid 1940s to early 1950s would look something like $1 = ¥350 ~ ¥400.
9) This is based on the following inscription engraved on the sword, “備前国包平作” (Bizen no kuni Kanehira saku). This translates as “made by Kanehira of Bizen country”
The next sword from the Tenga Goken will be the Juzumaru Tsunesugu (数珠恒次). This time around, we go in a different direction in terms of how Japanese swords are viewed both physically and in application. Going the opposite direction of them being used for killing by warriors, we will explore the idea of how a sword like the Juzumaru Tsunesugu played a symbolic role in Buddhist practices. Before going over its history, let’s first review its specifications.
A snapshot of Juzumaru Tsunetsugu without any fittings or handle, from the site “Touken World“.
Status: valuable cultural asset
Blade length: 82.1 cm
Curvature: 3.0 cm
Width (base): 4.0 cm
Width (tip): 2.0 cm
Maker: Aoe Tsunetsugu
An interesting point worth taking note of is that the Juzumaru Tsunetsugu’s status is that of a cultural piece, as opposed to a national treasure. This is because, while being an intangible piece of history with traceable history, it is neither in the possession of a national establishment nor part of an Imperial collection. Due to this, proper validation cannot be done on its authenticity. Still, its stated existence is accepted as being important on a cultural level, which isn’t an unusual thing as many historical items around Japan can be deemed as invaluable objects, yet stay in the hands of those outside of government-funded organizations and Imperial property.
Juzumaru Tsunetsugu exists today as part of the collection of artifacts at the temple Honkōji, where it can be viewed by visitors around the world.
BEGINNINGS
The Juzumaru Tsunetsugu was crafted by a swordsmith who’s addressed as “Aoe Tsunetsugu” (青江常次). Like many others in the same profession, Tsunetsugu’s surname is unknown. Instead, he is identified by where he comes from, which was Aoe in Bitchu Province (present day Kurashiki City, Okayama Prefecture). He was a member of the Aoe group of swordsmiths, which was started by his father, Aoe Moritsugu. Taking a quick look at the Aoe group timeline, Moritsugu and his group were active from the ending of Heian period to the early term of Kamakura period (1100s ~ 1200s), where Tsunetsugu, being the 2nd son out of 3 children, took over after his father at some point. To further bolster up his resume, Tsunetsugu was commissioned as the sole blacksmith by the Imperial palace to craft swords during 82nd Imperial successor Emperor Gotoba’s reign…but this should be taken with a grain of salt, as there were other blacksmiths who were utilized by the Imperial court as well.
After being brought to life by Tsunetsugu, the Juzumaru Tsunetsugu, or Juzumaru for short, was the property of the Buddhist temple Kuonji throughout most of its documented history. Its tie-in with Buddhism is key to the name “Juzumaru”, which there are are 2 symbolic meanings behind this. The first is the idea that “juzumaru” stands for the salvation of people from suffering, which is connected to the practice of the Buddhist sect Nichiren. The 2nd deals with the sword’s design, as at one point its handle was adorned with jewels in the likeliness of prayer beads, which are called “juzu” in Japanese¹.
ORIGINS THROUGH NICHIREN
Sources regarding the Juzumaru vary abit, but lead to the same point as to being part of the Tenga Goken due its splendor in craftsmanship. One particular source, known as “Shōchuu Tōken Meibutsuchō” (詳註刀剣名物帳), recounts its origin through the life of Nichiren, which goes as follow:
To the left, a statue honoring Nichiren, while to the right is “Founder’s Hall” (祖師堂, Soshidō), one of the buildings of Kuonji where Nichiren is worshiped.
In the past, many travelers feared traversing the paths that lead through the woods and mountains, as it was common knowledge that bandits laid in wait around those areas. Despite this, the saint Nichiren² planned to set off by himself to explore Mt. Minobu in Kai Country (present day Yamanashi Prefecture) during the early 13th century. Despite arguments from loyalists to dissuade such a dangerous journey, Nichiren would not listen. In order to ensure his safety, a sword from a country warrior living around the southern part at the base of the mountain was given to him. Nichiren accepted the sword and, before ascending Mt. Minobu, wrapped prayer beads around the sword handle, symbolically to ward off ill fortune.
Like a miracle, Nichiren was able to climb up and explore the mountain danger-free. Furthermore, it is said that there was enough supplies within the surroundings on the mountain where he could devise a thatch hut as a place for slumber and to protect him from the elements. After some time, the temple Kuonji, which would become the grounds of the Nichiren sect, was established on Mt. Minobu. It is also written that the sword Nichiren brought with him during his journey was later examined by Honami Kōhō, one of the descendants of the family-run sword evaluation who was also a devout of Nichiren teachings. He was able to identify it as the product of Aoe Tsunetsugu, a renown swordsmith. With that, this sword gained the name “Juzumaru”, and became a symbolic, treasured item of Kuonji temple and an asset to Buddhism.
More or less, this tale summarizes Juzumaru and its ties to Nichiren’s establishment of his own Buddhist sect. It is considered to be one of 3 keepsake relics of Nichiren after his death, with the other 2 being a his robe and a ceremonial folding fan. Being a Buddhist sword, it’s no surprise that it was not used for physical combat. Further evidence of this is the sword wasn’t even sharpened, but instead it’s edge was dull. This does open up some questions, such as the original purpose of the sword itself. Was it meant for self defense through fighting off bandits in the mountain through mortal combat? Since Nichiren wasn’t a warrior himself, it would go against the social caste during those times to arm a priest with a live sword. Maybe the idea of “self defense” was more of a sword that acted like a ward against ill fortune, thus the reason why the Juzumaru wasn’t sharpened.
Still, let it be known that an unsharpened sword is not unusual. In the past, along with arming warriors with sharp swords, it was not uncommon for swordsmiths to also make ceremonial swords that were unsharpened for non-combative purposes. Symbolically they “eliminated” ill fortune or evil spirits by “cutting” them down in order to ensure life proceeds correctly in the name of justice. Such a concept stems from Buddhism, which is defined by the phrase “hajakenshō” (破邪顕正).
BENEFACTOR OF THE JEWELED HILT #1
As mentioned before, “juzu” means prayer beads. It can also stand for jeweled beads, for beads made out of fine jewel stones represented great value and status in Japanese culture of old. Outside of the abridged “base” story of how Nichiren obtained the sword Juzumaru, there are other sources that can fill the blanks regarding Nichiren’s life up until the establishment of Kuonji temple. However, when it comes to this sword with its unique jeweled hilt, there are fewer sources to turn to. To be specific, there are 2 different versions that give their own take on who contributed to Juzumaru earning its name through the adornment of jewels on the handle. Here’s the 1st version.
There was a supporter, a benefactor of sorts who was Hakii Saburo Sanenaga (波木井三郎実長)³, a notable nobleman of the Imperial Court. A land owner within Kai Country, he became a follower of Buddhist teachings through Nichiren’s preaching around Kamakura. He was a strong supporter of his Buddhist teacher, from the start of his ascent up Mt. Minobu, to the establishment of Kuonji temple. Sanenaga continued to contribute to Kuonji temple after Nichiren’s death, which includes having the Juzumaru adorned with jeweled beads on the hilt.
A example of prayer beads, which is the likeliness the jewels fitted on Juzumaru’s sword handle was described to be. From Photo-AC.
Sanenaga appears to have been greatly involved in both Buddhism and the development of Kuonji temple per what is mentioned in remaining documentations. Thus, this version is considered factual for the most part. One can look at his involvement in having jewels adorned on Juzumaru’s sword handle a parallel to when Nichiren wrapped prayer beads around the sword handle during his journey. Along with it having an unsharpened edge, this majestic look of jewels in the form of prayer beads fit with the ideologies of Buddhism, thus adding to Juzumaru’s supernatural status, as well as netting it the nickname “Hajakenshō no ken” (破邪顕正の剣).
BENEFACTOR OF THE JEWELED HILT #2
There’s another take on a different individual who may have contributed to Juzumaru’s jeweled hilt it’s famous for. This second claim is through Hōjō Yagenta (北条弥源太), a warrior from a related branch of the Hōjō clan. The source of this information comes from personal writings by Yagenta known as ”Zenaku Nitō Gosho” (善悪二刀御書).
Living in Kamakura, he was one of many followers of the Buddhism teachings of Nichiren. When Nichiren declared his departure from Kamakura and going into isolation, Yagenta provided him with a daisho (大小), which is a long sword & short sword set, 3 months before his journey up Mt. Minobu. These swords were no simple items for mere self-defense, but were specially crafted to aid Nichiren in warding evil spirits which were to be (ritually) slain by these blessed blades. As one would guess, the long sword is said to be Juzumaru.
There is a little more to this version, which comes in the form of details pertaining to sword descriptions of this long-short sword pair. This description is taken from a documentation called “Fuji Daisekiji Meishoshi” (富士大石寺明細誌), which pertains records from a Buddhist temple Daisekiji in Shizuoka Prefecture. The sword descriptions (both original Japanese and my English transliteration) go as follow:
A digital version of ”Fuji Daisekiji Meishoshi”, with the sword descriptions presented in the red box. This can be viewed on the following website here.
JAPANESE ① 太刀 三条小鍛冶宗近作 二尺一寸 一腰 蓮祖の所持諸弘通の節之レを帯す、北条弥源太殿より之レを献ず
② 劔 久国作 九寸五分 一口 蓮祖弘通の節笈中に入る
ENGLISH 1) Long sword / Crafted by Sanjō Kokaji Munechika / 2 shaku 1 sun / single sword⁴ From Hōjō Yagenta, this was given to the saintly Nichiren, who wore this at his hip during his journey to where he would find his new home
2) Sword (short) / Crafted by Hisaku / 9 sun 5bu / single blade⁵ A sword part of the sacred items carried during Nichiren’s journey
There are a few points to unravel to get a clearer narrative. The 1st description is interpreted as Juzumaru being crafted by the famous Sanjō Munechika, while 2nd description speaks of the paired short sword being crafted by Hisaku from the Awataguchi clan. Hisaku was of a line of swordsmiths that predates Munechika, but they were apparently good friends⁶. On top of that, it is said that they were commissioned as official blacksmiths by Emperor Gotoba during his reign. Hōjō Yagenta, being a supporter of Nichiren, was made aware of his Buddhist teacher’s intended journey, and supposedly made preparations by commissioning a long sword be made for him by Munechika. As an extra, Hisaku also crafted a short sword, most likely from the same material. Yagenta was able to present this long and short sword set to Nichiren 3 months before the journey.
It’s safe to say that this story varies differently from the first version mentioned earlier, which raises many puzzling questions. The 1st point of concern is by whom hands Juzumaru was created by. Most sources state that Aoe Tsunetsugu is recorded as swordsmith who crafted Juzumaru, as his name can be verified to be on the tang of this same sword. Why the inconsistency here? Sanjō Munechika can be considered to have more claim to his name than Tsunetsugu, so attaching Juzumaru to him would play into the splendor of this sword. Could it be that in documenting the sword descriptions that the smith’s name was interpreted incorrectly? Or, if a sword by Munechika commissioned by Yagenta truly did exist⁷, it is possible that it was completely different from that made by Tsunetsugu. Maybe this “other” sword is mistakenly thought to be the Juzumaru. It is also a possibility for someone like Nichiren to have had several swords made for him as a form of protection on his journey up Mt. Minobu. The question here is would he have carried with him this multitude of swords? Most likely not, unless he had company to assist with such load.
The 2nd point of concern is Juzumaru being part of a long & short sword set, with a short sword crafted in the same liking as it. There are no records or surviving evidence that it was accompanied by a shorter sword…at least one by Tsunetsugu. While the idea of another great swordsmith like Hisaku crafting a pairing short sword to the Juzumaru does sound cool, it literally gets no mention outside of this version of the story. On top of this, there are no traces of this short sword, for it has yet to have been discovered.
Taking all of these aforementioned points into consideration, the consensus is that this long-short sword pair from Yagenta does not fit with the general take on Juzumaru’s origin, if the details themselves are factual at all. On one hand, this long & short sword set may have been completely different, but mistaken to be that of the legendary sword. It’s also possible that Nichiren was gifted with these swords, but didn’t take it with him on his journey? On the other hand, the entry about the sword details in the aforementioned documentation from Daisekiji temple doesn’t mention the name of the long sword, so blame should not be shifted here, but from any other sources that points to it being the one & only Juzumaru.
OTHER ADORNMENTS
Along with the jeweled hilt that resembles prayer beads, Juzumaru is described to have also been decorated with quality fittings. Early in this article, it was mentioned that the sword evaluator Honami Kōhō had examined this sword and judged its value. There is a document called “Kyōhō Meibutsucho” (享保名物帳), a record of antiquated swords, that mentions Kōhō also donated fine quality sword fittings, which were labeled as “Kōhō monozuki no koshirae” (光甫物数寄の拵). Apparently, these consisted of metallic components with a motif of renge (蓮華, lotus flowers) etched on them. The choice of renge, or lotus flowers, is most likely due to the deep connection this flower has with Buddhism, as well as the Lotus sutra recited in the Nichiren sect. It is also noted that Kōhō had donated these sword fittings sometime in the 1600s of early Edo period, which was centuries after the Juzumaru was crafted.
The section from the 1857 edition of “Kyōhō Meibutsucho”. The words “Juzumaru” and “Kōhō monozuki no koshirae” are highlighed by red lines as reference.
While Juzumaru is described as a well-adorned sword, these descriptions are only found on paper. Unfortunately, much of the adornment that were claimed to once have decorated this sword are currently not on the actual sword. This includes the prayer beads and the jewels fitted on the sword handle. The reasoning can be viewed from a couple of angles, the most suitable one is that these adornments were stolen. It’s highly possible that they were removed from Juzumaru for personal gain, which could include netting a high price to those who would buy them. Why would anyone want to purchase adornments that belong to a legendary sword like the Juzumaru? The simplest answer is that most people never heard of this sword, let alone have seen it unless they’ve made a trip to Kuonji temple, so any prospective buyer wouldn’t know the source of the fittings.
Another question would be as to when and how these adornments were removed from Juzumaru. While there are no solid answers to this, the following below will put this all into perspective.
FATE OF THE JUZUMARU
Stories about this legendary sword indicate that it’s synonymous with the Kuonji temple for centuries since Nichiren set out on his journey. However, an unusual incident happened where the Juzumaru was nowhere to be found sometime in the early 1700s; at a time, scholars and researchers alike could only go based on the writings about it, which painted a picture that it once existed. Why was it no longer at Kuonji temple? Was it stolen, or sold to support the temple? This point is still unknown⁸.
In 1919, a notable sword researcher named Sugihara Shōzō (杉原祥造) from Amagasaki city in Hyōgo prefecture, traveled around Japan studying the many swords that have survived, as well a purchasing those that were of antiquated value. One day, he discovered the Juzumaru at an auction house in his hometown, where items of aristocratic and nobility were sold to the highest bidder. Shōzō bought it and put notice to this discovery, as it was then reported in newspapers. What happens next is quite interesting, for he headed to Honkōji, the nearest Nichiren-sect temple in his hometown, and donated the sword there for safe keeping.
A picture of Juzumaru present-day, with no sword fittings, on display at Honkōji temple. This is from Amagasaki City website.
Why not return the Juzumaru to its original home at Kuonji? Speculations include that Shōzō had conflicting thoughts regarding Kuonji actually having possession of this particular sword in the first place, or if it was a fabrication all along. What was most important to him was to return this sacred relic to the rightful environment it belonged to, which was that of a Buddhist temple.
About a year later, Juzumaru was declared a former national treasure by Japan’s Ministry of Education and Culture under the following description:
Japanese
丙種 刀劍 太刀 銘恒次（数珠丸） 一口 兵庫県尼崎市別所村 本興寺
English
3rd class / sword Long sword / sword name Tsunetsugu (Juzumaru) / single blade Honkōji / located in a forest in Amagasaki city, Hyōgo Prefecture
in 1950, it would once again be re-evaluated by the Agency of Cultural Affairs, and be declared its new status as it now viewed as an important cultural property⁹.
ENDING
We come to a close on this treasured sword called Juzumaru Tsunetsugu. While it may never had tasted the impact of another sword on any of Japan’s numerous battlefields, the tales of it protecting a saint as a ward on his journey to establish his own Buddhist temple, as well as symbolically aided in the rituals performed there is the support that elevates this sword to the high recognition it holds now. Stay tuned for part five of the Tenga Goken series, which will feature the next sword known as Dōjigiri Yasutsuna.
1) While a minor topic, there has been a small debate in regards to this sword’s naming convention. While popular choice of kanji combination found in documents is “数珠”, there appears to be some that use “球数” instead. While both essentially mean the same thing, which is prayer beads, the former is the proper name, while the latter usually relates to the number count of the beads. It’s also not certain if the pronunciation would stay the same or switch to “suju” if the latter was the proper name. At the end of the day, the former, along with “juzu” is what sticks.
2) Saint Nichiren (日蓮上人, Nichiren Jōnin) can also be read as “priest Nichiren”, as he was a Buddhist priest. He was an actual person who was a scholar of Mahayana Buddhism, then declared his own version based on the same teachings, especially on the Lotus sutra. His climb up Mt. Minobu was actually due to self exile, for Nichiren faced many hardships (including imprisonments and banishment) for the sake of spreading Buddhist teachings, followed by depreciation by the government even after proving his teachings are of great value to the whole of Japan due to coincidental predictions of foreign invasion.
3) Also known by the saint name “Hakii Nanbu” (波木井南部).
4) The term “hitokoshi” (一腰) is another counter used for swords. This one is unique, as it identifies a sword that is slung at the hip, which is normal practice by warriors alike. Since this is a specialized counter, note that any swords not slung at the hip would most likely be identified by a different counter.
5) Just like hitokoshi, the term “hitokuchi” (一口) is another unique term not just for swords, but for bladed objects as a whole. In this case, a sword with a particular pattern along the blade near the edge identified as a kiriguchi (切り口) are referenced by this counter.
6) The two swordsmiths had a good relationship probably because they come from the same area in Japan, which was Yamashiro Country at the time. This area is now presently known as the southern area in Kyōto.
7) There was a police report of this “other” sword being stolen at night from a storage house (guessing at Kuonji temple?) in June of 1940. Apparently the lock was smashed and various valuable items, including this sword, were taken. However, there are some oddities to this claim, the main one being it was disclosed later to the police that this sword, along with other like items, was noticed to have been missing since April of the same year. Not much is known with this case afterwards.
8) Interestingly, there are a couple of documentations that mention the Juzumaru being relocated outside Kuonji temple for safe keeping at a time. However, in these cases this supposedly happened much earlier before the sword’s inevitable disappearance in the early 1700s. On top of this, those documentations are considered to be like diary entries, so they cannot be viewed as factual, especially since such records are also not found in Kuonji temple.
9) The page where the Juzumaru is listed on the Agency of Cultural Affairs can be found here.
The second sword we are looking at from the famed Tenga Goken is the Mikazuki Munechika (三日月宗近). This sword has a history of passing through the hands of elite families, all the way up to modern times. Let’s take a look at the specifics:
Images of the Mikazuki Munechika (blade only, top) and its saya (scabbard, bottom). From Wikipedia.
Status: national treasure
Blade length: around 78.2 cm
Curvature: 2.7 cm
Width: 2.9 cm
Wrapping: tachi-style with (silk?) thread-wrapped handle, paired with a scabbard
Maker: Sanjō Munechika
Unlike the Onimaru Kunitsuna, there is more info on the Mikazuki’s construction, from the number of mekugiana (holes for rivets on a sword hilt) in its tang, to the type of threads and brass that adorns its handle. Due to how detailed the descriptions are about its features, the Mikazuki Munechika is considered the most lavishly adorned out of the Tenga Goken. As a national treasure, it is currently being kept at the Tokyo Kokuritsu Senbutsukan (Tokyo National Museum).
Specific info regarding the origins of the Mikazuki Munechika come from a 1488 old record called “Chōkyō Meizukuri” (長享銘尽). As an example, it is though to have been made sometime in the 10th century of the Heian era, during the reign of the Emperor Tenjō. There are also info about it bearing the signature “Sanjō” on its tang, and is made by “Sanjō Kokaji Munechika” (三条小鍛冶宗近)¹ of the Sanjō craftsman group, are listed. This sword’s name being “Mikazuki” is also stated here. The following line from the “Kyōhō Meibutsucho” (享保名物帳) hints on how this name came to be. The original Japanese is presented, followed by my transliteration.
JAPANESE:「三ヶ月と申す仔細は三ヶ月形の打のけ数々有之依て名付たる由」
TRANS: “The reason behind it getting the name “Mikazuki” is based on the client’s request, where, under specific instructions, the blade was struck repeatedly during the crafting process into a thin blade bearing the shape of a 3rd-day moon (crescent moon)”
While there is an “accepted” history, the list of owners of the Mikazuki Munechika is not definitively confirmed, as there seems to be varying sources. We’ll begin with the 1st theory, which begins with Hino Uchimitsu.
THEORY #1: ORIGIN THROUGH UCHIMITSU
Hino Uchimitsu (日野 内光) was the 2nd son of Tokudaiji Saneatsu, a senior court official in the Imperial Court during the Muromachi period. Born in 1489, he was a high-ranking noble who held different ranks in the Imperial court. It’s not stated how Uchimitsu acquired the Mikazuki, but most accepted sources say that its history starts with him.
Uchimitsu took part in the conflicts that erupted between Hosokawa Takakuni and the loyal followers of Kozai Motomori, Hatano Motokiyo and Yanagimoto Kataharu. When Takakuni had Motomori commit suicide, the two brothers revolted against him, raising a force to attack his castles. Different influential individuals were called to assist from both sides, with Uchimitsu siding with the brothers.
In the 2nd month of 1527 Uchimitsu took part in one of the battles, which occurred within the region of Katsurakawara in Kyoto prefecture. He led his force and faced off against Hosokawa Takakuni’s army, wielding the Mikazuki. However, Uchimitsu was killed during the course of the battle. It is said that to this day, you can see a chip in the sword, being proof of him using this sword in battle.
The faith of Uchimitsu and the Mikazuki was not left unchecked. It is said that Hatake Bokuzan, a fellow companion and feudal lord from the East, had given this fallen warrior a funeral, and offered the Mikazuki to a temple called Kōyasan (高野山) located in Wakayama prefecture. Bokuzan did so as a means to wish him good fortune in the afterlife.
While it may be so that the Mikazuki was once kept in Kōyasan, there seems to be doubt as to who actually brought it there. You see, Bokuzan actually passed away in 1522, 5 years before Uchimitsu’s death in battle. Was there a miscalculation in the dates? Probably not. Is it possible that another member of the Hatake did this? Currently there is no evidence on other Hatake members being involved with this matter. What is accepted, however, is that this fine sword was later taken from Kōyasan by Toyotomi Hideyoshi, one of the few successful rulers to unify Japan during its warring period.
FROM ONE OWNER TO ANOTHER
From records found in the collection of Hideyoshi’s wife, Kōdaiin (高台院)², is a written account about the Mikazuki. It is listed as a memento, as it appears she kept the Mikazuki, even after Hideyoshi’s death. She even kept it after power of rule was taken by Tokugawa Ieyasu in the early 1600s, who established the centuries-long Tokugawa Shogunate. Kōdaiin lived until the age 78, and passed away in 1624.
Artwork of Kodaiin during her period as a Buddhist nun.
In the same year of Kodaiin’s death, this memento was inherited by Tokugawa Hidetada, the third son of Ieyasu who became the 2nd shogun in 1605. From here on, the Mikazuki is recorded as a sword part of the Tokugawa family’s collection. Talk about it can be found in the “Onkoshimono Motocho” (御腰物元帳), a document written in 1868 about swords collected and owned by the many Tokugawa shoguns. There are other documents that give details of how it was passed down within the Tokugawa family as a family heirloom.
The Mikazuki would remain in the Tokugawa family for many generations, even after the Tokugawa Shogunate was dissolved. The last member of this illustrious family to hold onto it was Tokugawa Iesato, who was a prince/duke at the time. In 1929, Iesato brought attention to this old relic when he had it put up for display at the Japan Renown Treasure Exhibition (日本名宝展覧会).
With attention brought back to the Mikazuki, people seek out to learn more about it. One of these happened to be Honma Junji, a respected researcher on ancient swords, was given the chance to inspect it sometime between 1930 and 1931. He He then wrote about it in a publication called “Kenzan Tōwa” (薫山刀話), giving the sword high praise in regards to its craftsmanship. In time, the Mikazuki was given a grade as an antique, being categorized as an ancient national treasure.
In 1945, the Mikazuki will leave the centuries-long possession of the Tokugawa family, and be passed around a few times in the hands of avid antique collectors. In 1992, it would make its new home at the Japan National Museum, where it is part of its vast collections of ancient and modern works of art. This is where the Mikazuki can be found today.
THEORY #2: ORIGIN THROUGH YAMANAKA YUKIMORI
The other supposed origin of the Mikazuki comes from the Chōkyō Meizukushi (長享銘尽), a document about particular swords that is estimated to have been written around 1488. In this, it is mentioned that a Yamanaka Yukimori (山中幸盛), a warrior from Sanin area of Central Japan, had initially possessed the Mikazuki. At this time, this sword had a mikazuki (crescent moon) motif, thus how it got its namesake.
Artwork of Yamanaka Yukimori from the ukiyoe series “One-Hundred Aspects of the Moon” (月百姿), entitled “Crescent Moon of Faith – Yukimori” (信仰の三日月 幸盛). By Tsukioka Yoshitoshi.
The issue with this theory is in regards to when Yukimori was alive. Records show that he was born in 1545, which is almost 60 years after the Chōkyō Meizukushi was written. Unless this said document was updated to include his data, this is a discrepancy which can debunk this theory. With this being said, it is not impossible for this to be the case; as with anything that is a form of records, it is not unusual for documents to get added information over the years, in order to keep it up-to-date for the times. Speaking of records, Yukimori is quite a famous figure, as there are many tales and paintings that hail him with praise & merit. In fact, he is glorified based on a particular courageous last stand in Harima Province’s Kozuki castle against the mighty force of the invading Mōri clan in 1578, where he worked hard in assisting in the revival of his benefactor, the once-elite Amago clan. Before his inevitable fall, it is said that Yukimori went to Kōyasan, prayed before the Mikazuki that was kept there as he put his faith in the strength of the sword, then proceeded to take it with him³.
Was it truly the same “Mikazuki” in which this article is about? There is a possibility it is not, as it conflicts greatly with other official documents that state it was in the safekeeping of the Toyotomi family. On another note, “Mikazuki” is not an unusual title, so there is a high possibility that there were other swords that bore the same namesake, which could be the case for Yukimori.
Here’s some other key points regarding this version of the Mikazuki:
Measures at 2 shaku 2 sun 8 bu (about 60 cm)
It was nicknamed “Hangetsumaru” due to the unique hamon (pattern created along the blade) visible on it.
Part of its fittings included a handle wrap that had an elite family emblem called “kikukiri”
There are accounts of other swords that were owned by him, all about the size of a wakizashi. This includes one that had the length of 64 cm⁴, was crafted by Sukesada, a famous swordsmith⁵, and had a record of it being kept in the possession of Namazue Sakyou-no-suke.
An image of the kikukiri emblem.
With this, along with some other info related to Yamanaka Yukimori, the consensus about this version of the Mikazuki is that it most likely is not the same as the one that had its start with Hino Uchimitsu, if this one actually did exist.
ENDING
This article on Mikazuki comes to a close. A work of fine details and appealing design, the Mikazuki was not a weapon used on the battlefield, or much for combat for that matter. Instead, it was held as a trophy, and an item of status that significant individuals took pride in acquiring. Stay tuned for the next part of this series, which will feature the Juzumaru Tsunetsugu as the next sword from the Tenga Goken.
1) What is actually written is “Sanjō Kokaji”, but this is historically known to be tied to Munechika.
2) “Kōdaiin” is her Buddhist name, which was taken up after Hideyoshi passed away, and she established the temple Kōdaiji. Her other names prior to this included “Nene”, and “Toyotomi Yoshiko”.
3) This scene is often depicted as poetic, where Yukimori declares his faith to the moon in the sky. At this time, the phase of the moon is said to be that of a crescent moon. There are other artworks that show him doing so under the moon. However, it seems that him actually taking the Mikazuki Munechika from the temple at Kōyasan while performing this could have been an add-on to strengthen his connection with this sword.
4) In Japanese old measurements, 2 shaku 1 sun 2 bu
5) As a quick background reference, Sukesada is said to have come from Bizen no kuni (Bizen country), and learned to be a swordsmith under the Osafune. He made a name for himself as being very talented. However, there are many swords that have “Sukesada” engraved on the sword tang, indicating the name itself became a brand that others used. Due to this, it is tricky to credit him for all the swords that bear his signature.
The first sword we will cover in depth is the Onimaru Kunitsuna (鬼丸国綱). This sword was actually introduced in another article, entitled “Unique Swords with the Finest Edge“. Wielded by those of nobility and military status, it is portrayed as a mystical sword able to dispatch evil spirits, thus protecting its owner. Bearing such an illustrious profile, one would imagine it’s a true treasure with such power anyone would never bear to part from it. To be honest, this perception is not 100% accurate, for at a time the Onimaru Kunitsuna had a very negative reputation. Before we go into its rather rocky history, let’s examine this sword’s specifications.
Images of the blade of the Onimaru Kunitsuna. From Wikipedia.
Status: Imperial treasure
Blade length: 78.2 cm
Curvature: 3.2 cm
Maker: Kunitsuna
Out of the 5 swords, the Onimaru Kunitsuna is deemed a treasure of the Imperial Palace. This, however, does not mean it’s a national treasure, for it is rarely on display for public viewing, while few publishing have pictures of it. This may have to do with its rather complex history, and how it came to be included in the safekeeping of the Imperial Palace. Much of its extra-ordinary status comes from documents considered recordings of actual past events, like the novel-styled historical writings from the “Taiheiki” (太平記), and the Imperial logs of legendary and political matters from the “Gobutsu Chōsho” (御物調書). When reviewing the actual documents or sites that reference these same sources that pertain to the Onimaru Kunitsuna, you notice that much of it is unusually detailed dialogues and labeling just for a sword, which can range from its passing from one owner to another as a spoils of war, to reference during a simple evaluation by order of a government official. While I can’t say that all that’s written about the Onimaru Kunitsuna is factual or not, I will say that some of the info is a little over the top, and should be taken with a grain of salt.
BELOVED SWORD OF THE HŌJŌ CLAN
The origins of this sword is traced to around mid 1200s, during the Kamakura period. Hōjō Tokimasa, the 5th Regent who was in control of the government body known as Kamakura Bakufu, commissioned the swordsmith Awataguchi Kunitsuna to craft him a special sword. This was fulfilled, with the sword being called “Kunitsuna” based on the name signed on it.
An ukiyoe of Hōjō Tokimasa. From Wikipedia.
This sword would also gain an addition to its name, “Onimaru”¹, a little later. This came about when Tokimasa was tormented by nightmares caused by a demon while sleeping. As if willed by an unknown power from his keepsake sword, Tokimasa drew Kunitsuna out of its sheath and swung it down, cleaving off a part of the leg of his light stand that had the mark of a demon on it. From this, Tokimasa would give his sword the full title “Onimaru Kunitsuna”, as he believed it was good luck against mystical danger. Thus, it was a treasure of the Hōjō family for several generations.
However, this “good luck” of the Onimaru (title choice for remainder of article) was not witnessed again outside of the Hōjō household. This beloved sword was safely in the possession of this family up until the 14th successor Hōjō Takatoki, and after his passing, would later fall into the possession of Nagoe Takaie, who was the son of Hōjō Tokiie². It is said that in 1333, as many groups rose to oppose the Kamakura Bakufu rule controlled by the Hōjō clan, a particular rivalry between the Nagoe (Hōjō) clan and Akamatsu clan erupted, leading to skirmishes between both sides. The Hojo clan made an attempt to claim Yamazaki (present-day Ōyamazaki Town, Kyoto) from the Akamatsu clan. Takaie took part in this as he rode into the fray with the Onimaru at his side at Koganawate (present day Fushimi Ward, Kyoto City)³. However, he suffered the ill fate of being shot between the eyebrows by an arrow, dropping him dead in battle. Due to this tragedy, the Onimaru would later be returned back to his father Takatoki.
MISFORTUNES AS AN IMPLEMENT FOR WAR
A war commander by the name of Nitta Yoshisada would be next to gain possession of the Onimaru. This happened during an assault on Kamakura later in the same year, where it became evident that the might of the Hōjō clan was waning. Hōjō Kunitoki made an attempt to repel the assault, but things were looking grim on his side. At this time, he would have in his possession the Onimaru, and attempted to escape. However, he was caught by a subordinate of Nitta Yoshisada, assembled with other family members at a temple called Tōshōji, and was forced to commit suicide. Here is where the beloved sword would switch to the hands of Yoshisada. To claim such a treasure from a powerful family such as the Hōjō would mean good things to come…or so that was the thought.
An artwork entitled, “Nitta Yoshisada Ikuta no Mori no tatakai ni oite Koyamada Takaie Yoshisada no migawari to naru” (新田義貞生田林の戦に於て小山田高家義貞の身代りとなる). Depicted here is Nitta Yoshisada who is weilding the Onimaru Kunitsuna in a difficult battle. Created by Tsuchiya Koitsu.From Wikipedia.
We turn to the Ashikaga clan, who originally were supporters of the Hōjō clan, and rose in power by establishing their own military government in Kamakura by the new shogun Ashikaga Takauji. Not in agreement of the sudden change of power, Nitta Yoshisada opposed Ashikaga Takauji, resulting in them going to war. At first nothing impactful took place between the two sides, but soon Takauji would start to get the upper hand. In 1338, during the battle at Fujishima in Echizen Province, Yoshisada rode out into battle with the Onimaru and another sword known as the “Onikiri” (鬼切), attempting to prevail through his 2 auspicious swords. However, being caught by a rain of arrows from the enemy, he was shot dead as one of the arrows pierced between his eyebrows. Yet again, another display of the Onimaru providing no protection to those who attempt to wield it in physical battle
As the spoils of war, the Onimaru, along with the Onikiri, were taken by Shiba Takatsune, a commander who was in the service of the new shogun. Learning of the successful victory over Nitta Yoshisada and his army, Takauji sent a messenger to learn the whereabouts of the swords. When questioned by the messenger, Takatsune lied that both swords were kept in a training center, but was lost in a fire that erupted inside, destroying the building and everything inside. It would later be discovered that this was a lie, which Takauji lamented over this fact. Eventually, Takauji managed to secure the auspicious sword in his possession.
An interesting observation worth noting is that from this point on, the Onimaru will not be taken to the battlefield again, due to the misfortune of defeat and death that befell those thinking its surreal spiritual power would transfer to victorious physical strength⁴. Instead, it stayed as one of many valuable treasures within the position of the Ashikaga clan.
THE VALUABLE TREASURE MANY REFUSED TO TAKE IN
From here on forward, the Onimaru will pass through the hands of other prominent figures in Japan outside of being a spoils of war. This first takes place sometime around the late 1560s to early 1570s, when the 15th Ashikaga shogun Ashikaga Yoshiaki gave potential rival Oda Nobunaga the sword as a peace offering. In turn, Nobunaga gave it years later to his vassal, Toyotomi Hideyoshi⁵. By now, the Onimaru had a reputation of being a mystical blade that can eradicate evil spirits, but bearing the potential of bringing ill luck to those who wield it out on the battlefield. Taking an interesting turn by believing in the tales of its ability to ward away evil spirits, Hideyoshi had it evaluated by the Honami clan, and lent it to Honami Kōtoku for safe keeping.
The Onimaru stayed as part of the Toyotomi family’s collection for a few decades. However, this would change after their demise when they lost during a war on their home, Ōsaka castle, by Tokugawa Ieyasu and supporters from eastern Japan in mid 1615⁶. Ieyasu would seize control over Japan as the new shogun, and establish the Tokugawa Shogunate. As if following protocol, Kōtoku would give the sword to the new Shogun, as it now has a new owner. Despite receiving this great sword, Ieyasu decided to follow suite and pass it back to Kōtoku for continued safe keeping…possible due to suspicion of its “unlucky” reputation.
Artwork of Tokugawa Ieyasu, from the series “Mikawa Eiyuden” (三河英雄伝). By Utagawa Yoshitora. From Wikipedia.
In 1626, Ieyasu’s granddaughter, Tokugawa Masako, gave birth to the 2nd prince of the Imperial family, whose name was Sukehitoshinō. As she was be-wedded to Emperor Gomizunō and tied the Tokugawa family’s lineage to the Imperial line, this was an honorable occasion. As an offering, the Tokugawa family had the Onimaru delivered to the Imperial family, as a sign of their connecting with the newborn prince. Unfortunately, Sukehitoshinō would suddenly pass away in 1628, after his 3rd birthday⁷. The cause of death was thought to have been due to the “unlucky” sword, thus having it returned back to The Honami clan for safe keeping yet again.
The Onimaru remained in the care of the Honami clan for some time. They were also rewarded for their dedicated service at some point, as the sword was maintained in exceptional condition. However, after being unclaimed for a few centuries, the faith of the Onimaru would finally be decided in 1867, with rule over Japan being restored to the Imperial line after the fall of the Tokugawa Shogunate. With this change in power, the sword was no longer an item of the Tokugawa family, but instead recognized as an Imperial treasure. It would then be added into the collection of the Emperor and the Imperial Palace in 1881, after the Honami clan fell into a decline in a successor to properly fulfill the job of sword care & evaluations. This is how the extraordinary sword known as Onimaru Kunitsuna would find its last home, and remain as part of the Imperial collection to this day.
ENDING
We close this article on the 1st sword out of the Tenga Goken, Onimaru Kunitsuna. Bearing the reputation of its spiritual powers to eradicate evil spirits, it received quite a reputation during a time where many were superstitious. On the flip side, it was also deemed bad luck, which stemmed from providing no protection against physical dangers, to bringing untimely death. Are all these tales about the Onimaru Kunitsuna warrant? It’s impossible to get full clarity, but it does indeed make for an interesting tale. Stay tuned part 3, which will cover the the next sword known as Juzumaru Tsunesugu.
1) This is also the shorthand name for the sword
2) The Nagoe clan was a related branch of the Hōjō line
3) This particular clash is properly know as Koganawate no Gassen (Battle at Koganawate)
4) It is rumored that the 13th shogun Ashikaga Yoshiteru (1536~1565), a skilled swordsman, wielded the Onimaru against overwhelming odds at Nijō Gojo in Kyoto. This is a statement without a reliable source, so can’t say that this is true.
5) Toyotomi Hideyoshi is the name he’s most recognized by after he became shogun of Japan in late 1500s. While he was serving under Oda Nobunaga, he went by a different name, which was Hashiba Hideyoshi.
6) This war is known as “Ōsaka no Jin” (Siege of Ōsaka), which was a 2-part assault with the 1st taking place in the winter of 1614, then the 2nd in the summer of 1615.
7) This is based on the traditional age calculating method primarily used in Eastern Asian, where a newborn baby is considered one year old, then gets one more year added after the New Year.
There are several icons related to Japan stand out. One of them being the katana. Both historically and culturally, there was a strong viewpoint regarding the importance of swords, way back when the warrior class still existed. In fact, there is the famous saying that “the sword is the soul of the warrior”¹. Although it was not the strongest weapon used during wars, it was nonetheless held at a high value, as a sword also represented status.
There are many stories about amazing swords coming from Japan, especially in fiction. Usually these stories are based on real versions crafted generations ago, which, in themselves, come with their own rumors and tales about being extra ordinary. Interestingly, there is one group of swords that are considered the best of their kind, known as “Tenga Goken” (天下五剣)², which can be read as “5 Great Swords of Japan” in English.
An auspicious example where tales paint a picture of a fine sword blade being enhanced through mystic means. Artwork entitled “Gekkō Zuihitsu Inabayama Kokaji”, a swordsmith by the name of Sanjō Munechika is helped by his family patreon deity Inari-myojin, who appears in child form. By Ogata Gekkō.
What could be so special about these swords that grant them such a title? What’s their origin? Who were the owners of each these five swords? Which ones were deemed supernatural? All of this will be covered in a multi-part series. Today’s article will be part 1 of this series, which will cover the origins of this claim. This will include the individuals who were experts in evaluating swords, along with recordings in the form of official documents that determine the quality level of these unique swords.
A WORD OF CAUTION
Before we proceed, let’s cover some notes that will give a broader view on this topic. While there are fairly aged books that have information regarding the Tenga Goken, it should be understood that a definitive name, along with cohesive details, were not nicely written in one go. On the contrary, it’s taken many generations, along with slightly varying descriptions, before we have an actual picture of said 5 great swords. However, is this picture real and accurate?
For starters, it is said that the following 5 swords make up the Tenga Goken:
Mikazuki Munechika (日月宗近)
Onimaru Kunitsuna (鬼丸国綱)
Dōjigiri Yasutsuna (童子切安綱)
Juzumaru Tsunetsugu (数珠丸恒次)
Odenta Mitsuyo (大典太光世)
These are judged as 5 exemplary swords, and were supposedly chosen sometime during the Muromachi period³. However, the individual(s) who made this assessment is unknown. On top of this, the label used to group these swords, Tenga Goken, was not originally as a headline for some listing. Instead, this was derived from descriptions regarding the 5 swords from said older documents. If anything, the name and the determination of the five swords grouped as Tenga Goken was something that came into play later in the Edo period. So, while this claim of 5 great swords may have been something finalized at a much later date, what we do know is that they do exist, and some documentation about them did take place. For what it’s worth, all 5 swords are said to still exist present day, and are in safe keeping as antiques. More about this in the upcoming articles.
ORIGINS WITH THEHONAMI CLAN
We get the 1st documentation that speaks on the Tenga Goken, which is called “Meikenden” (名劔伝)⁴. Part of the collection of the Tokyo National Museum, the Meikenden was compiled in 1769 in a document entitled, “Honnami-ke no Meibutsu Hikae-cho” (本阿彌家の名物扣帳). This is a listing of established blacksmiths around Japan, and swords that are their prized works. In listings like this, each sword is judged by certain traits, which will then put each into varying categories such as their grade of quality, being a visually fine piece of work, to having a unique story in its creation.
Here is the cover of the Meikenden (left), and the page that mentions the 5 swords that make up Tenga Goken (right). The swords are identified by a red mark above them.
So, who were the Honami clan and what was so special about them? They had a long history of being recognized as sword polishers, and later as experts in evaluating sword. In surviving records, the 1st head of this clan, Honami Myōhon, established his clan’s rise during the early Nanbokucho period (1337-1392) by being employed under Ashikaga Takauji, a war commander who would later establish the 1st shogunate under the Ashikaga rule and start the Muromachi bakufu around 1338. With Myōhon establishing this connection, the Honami clan became a dōboūshū (同朋衆) to the Ashikaga clan, which means they were personal artisans of whom were considered the most powerful at the time. Although being known to have such a prestigious relationship, the Honami clan didn’t just stay idle; they also took up the occupation as merchants and traveled abit throughout Japan over the centuries. Another point to take note is that, as their clan expanded, they also branched into other arts, such as calligraphy (書道, shodō), lacquer decorations using metal powder (蒔絵, makie), pottery (陶芸, tōgei) and tea ceremony (茶道, chadō).
OFFICIAL SWORD EVALUATIONS
It wasn’t until Honami Kōtoku, 9th successor, was recognized as an expert in sword evaluation, from where his clan was permitted in establishing methods for sword polishing, as well as determining the quality and style of swords being crafted. In due time, Honami Kōshitsu (本阿弥光室), the 10th successor, created a log in the form of an orihon (折本) that list detailed analysis on different swords of the time sometime between the late 1500s to early 1600s. While the Honami clan were famous due to their start by serving the Ashikaga shogunate, over the generations they also provided service to those who seeked their expertise. This includes Toyotomi Hideyoshi in the 1500s. Lastly, in 1719, when Tokugawa Yoshimune, 8th shogun of the Tokugawa shogunate, had the 13th successor Honami Kōchū commissioned to document the know-how about his clan’s lifework as sword polishers, Kōchū created a catalog called “Kyōhō Meibutsucho” (享保名物帳). It’s highly probable that this was used as one of the bases for in the aforementioned book, “Meikenden”.
DESCRIPTIONS OF 5 GREAT SWORDS
The next book of interest is “Shoka Meikenshu” (諸家名剣集), which was compiled in 1828. What’s interesting here is that this is a copy of the older book Kyōhō Meibutsucho, which is coupled with descriptions about each of the 5 swords. This is where we get many references that lead to the label “Tenga Goken”. Below are the pages from this book where each of these 5 swords are mentioned. The name of the sword and the particular phrase are indicated by a red line. (this is placed to the right of the text in the image) This will also be accompanied by the typed Japanese text, followed by my English transliteration.
三日月宗近 「右五振ノ内也」
Mikazuki Munechika “To the right,one of the 5 swords“
Note that this sword and its descriptions are mentioned on a previous page (left), while the phrase above continues onto the following page (right)
鬼丸国綱 「右五振之内随一と申也」
Onimaru Kunitsuna “To the right, this is said to be #1 out of the 5 swords”
Note that descriptions for this sword spans around 8 pages, and the phrase mentioned above appears on the 7th page (right)
童子切安綱 「誠ニ天下出群之名刀ニ而右五振之内也」
Dōjigiri Yasutsuna “One of the 5 renown swords, This sword to the right is famous as being “truly unrivaled” in excellence“
数珠丸恒次 「天下出群之名劒にて右五振ノ内也」
Juzumaru Tsunetsugu “To the right,one of the 5 swords due to it being a famous sword unrivaled in excellence“
大典太光世 「 是又天下出群之名剣五振之内也」
Odenta Mitsuyo “To the right,this is also among the 5 swords due to it being a famous sword unrivaled in excellence“
Key words to take away here are “5 swords” (五振)⁵ and “unrivaled” (天下). Although the word “unrivaled” appears for 3 out of the 5 swords, it’s most likely assumed that the other 2 swords should be of the same caliber if grouped in the same category.
ENDING
This concludes our look at the origins to the categorizing of the Tenga Goken. In the following articles more details will cover each sword, from the swordsmiths who made each one, to how they made their marks in history.
1) In Japanese, it is “katana wa bushi no tamashii” (刀は武士の魂).
2) Can also be pronounced “Tenka Goken”.
3) Note that the term for these swords used is “tachi” (太刀). In the past, swords were classified as a tachi based on having a bigger curve in the blade, meeting the standard length of a battlefield sword, and used while riding horseback. This is different from swords that were made for fighting on foot, such as the katana. On another note, the Tenga Goken were also praised as being works of art based on the craftsmanship that made them look magically appealing.
4) Note that there is 1 extra sword mentioned on the same page as the Tenga Goken in the book Meikenden, which is “Kanze Masamune” (観世正宗). This sword was made by the renown blacksmith group Masamune. While swords by Masamune are considered works of art in their own rights, they are not categorized along with the previous 5 swords, as the Tenga Goken were held in a class of their own years before this book was written.
5) This is read as go-furi (5 swords) in Japanese, whereas furi is a counter for swords as an object that is swung. Even though the word “sword” is not present, the counter itself lets the reader know what is being referenced here.
There are many interesting documents of old that describe all sorts of trades, practices, cultural topics from pre-modern Japan. This is especially true for those who are enthusiasts of Japanese martial/military history, for there are many resources on said topic. Some famous documents are usually easy to obtain as great strides are taken to make these more readily available to the public. Then there are those rare gems that are part of individuals’ personal collection or found in second-hand bookstores, which, if lucky, may be shared either through exclusive meetings, events based on invitations, or even online. While it’s tempting to take all martial/military-related documents at face-value and view them as windows into the past, it’s also important to discern genuine from fabrication.
There is a term for documents that we must be wary about, which is “gisaku” (偽作). While it’s simple to translate this term as “forgery” or “fake”, this term actually has more layers to its use. There are reasons to labeling an old document gisaku, which could range from, but not limited to, the following:
A document having reputable information, but is a direct copy (i.e. Chinese war strategies that were copied for use in Japan, but this fact is not stated)
A particular family or group claiming genuine tactics, but in reality they were copied & altered to appear “genuine” (i.e. clandestine tactics that were copied from another reputable source, but arranged to fit a specific narrative unique to the individuals in question)
A document containing unusual/suspicious practices that may be made up (i.e. ritual practices said to be done before setting out to the battlefield, which in truth seems out of place compared to other historical recordings)
Stories & notes in the form of a war journal, which may be exaggerated (i.e. A family journal claiming great exploits in certain events, but unverifiable in legitimate historical records)
In the following text below, certain excerpts from a source entitled, “Buke Kojitsu Gunrei bassho” (武家故実軍令抜書, Excerpts of Customary Practices and Rules of the Samurai) will be used to illustrate this point about war documents that could be labeled as gisaku. Unfortunately, the author of this is not mentioned, which leans it closer to not the most trust-worthy of documents as there’s no way to verify the information.
KŌGAI, THE MULTI-PURPOSE TOOL
Before we look at these excerpts, I will explain some background pointers. The topic of this document is a small, sharp implement called a “kōgai” (笄). While normally labeled as a hairpin primarily used by women in the past, there was a similar version synonymous to warriors during the Sengoku Period all the way to mid/late Edo period. The kōgai used by warriors was a key component found inserted into the opening of their sword’s scabbard. Its’ usage varied slightly throughout the ages in Japan, as it went through some alterations from having specific functions to becoming a decorative standard accessory on the scabbard. The kōgai is regarded as one of the “mitokoromono” (三所物), which were 3 essential items that accompanied one’s sword (high-ranking or lower-ranking alike) , which included the menuki (目貫) and kozuka (小柄).
Take note that a word of caution comes with the contents of this document; while there is evidence regarding the importance of the kōgai and the mitokoromono, it has not been verified that its usage as a multi-purpose tool as mentioned here to be true. It is also highly possible that this was written during Edo period, way after Japan was moving towards an era of peace, being that there may be some romanticizing ideas here at play that glorify things that never was practiced by warriors of old.
EVALUATING OLD PRACTICES WITH THE KŌGAI
Below are seven excerpts from Buke Kojitsu Gunrei bassho. Note that while the title for each excerpt will be translated from Japanese to English, the explanation for each will not be a direct translation, but instead will be more of a description. Also, without being too opinionated, I added a comment below for each one, mainly based on similar practices to each one.
#1: Using a kōgai to insert a head-trophy marker during a battle (軍場の首札としての使い方) Warriors get rewarded for the number of enemy soldiers they slay on the battlefield. There are several ways of claiming one’s “head-trophy” during battle, which will then be evaluated later. One of the ways is to put a form of marker in their hair. For this document, it is said that for slain enemies who have no hair (such as a warrior monk), to pierce one’s kōgai into their ear to create a hole, in which then a head trophy marker can be inserted.
COMMENT: In my limited research, this is reminiscent of other methods of leaving a marker on a slain opponent that will be used as your prize. This one is unique for bald soldier, which is new to me.
#2: Using a kōgai when your horse is tired while in battle(軍場で馬が疲労した時の使い方) When riding an exhausted horse on the battlefield, there should be someone, such as a stable boy, to assist with resolving the situation. When found alone and no one to help, you would use your kōgai to pierce into the lower part of its leg to perform phlebotomy.
COMMENT: Since high-ranking warriors were privileged to riding on horseback, attendants tend to be close by to assist in various ways. While some details are missing, this sounds like a method to spur on your horse to be reinvigorated by inflicting pain to it.
#3: When the Commander gives a retainer his kōgai(大将が臣下に笄をお渡しになる場合があること) In this case, a retainer is used as a spy and sent out by his Commander to handle certain tasks in enemy territory. The commander will give the retainer a specific kōgai, which allows the retainer to be recognized during meetups upon his return.
COMMENT: While this sounds like something from a spy thriller, this is highly possible. Whether or not this method was truly used is a different story.
#4: Using the kōgai to scale a castle wall(塀越の時の使い方) In the event where a castle wall needs to be scaled, one’s kōgai can be used by inserting it into the gap of the stone foundation. This way, you step on the kōgai to propel you up in order to reach the top of the castle wall. If in a group, the person most skilled at this will perform this task. When there is doubt amongst your group about how to scale the wall, suggest using the kōgai will help for reinsurance.
COMMENT: I’ve heard of steel pegs and the like being inserted into the crevice of a stone wall in order to climb up a castle back during Japan’s warring times. I wouldn’t rule out the effectiveness of a kōgai being used for such a task, although it is a pretty short implement.
#5: Using a kōgai during a night raid (戦場で夜討する時の使い方) Your group has taken down the enemy’s fort at night, but you do not have time to claim the heads of your slain opponents. In the case where the enemy commander, or any other high-ranking warrior, was slain by your hands, then you should stab your kōgai into the eye or ear of your victim. This way, it can be verified later.
COMMENT: This is possible, as I’ve heard other examples of leaving a form of mark on slain soldiers that can later be identified as being that from a specific individual. It is also said that if the kōgai is part of your mitokoromono that has a unique motif, then there won’t be any dispute as it being yours.
#6: Using kōgai-gakure while at an inn when traveling about (旅の宿における笄隠れ) When there is a concern about being watched while in your room at an inn, you are advised to make your room dark without actually quenching the flame from the andō (行燈), which is a paper-encased oil lantern. The trick is as followed: pass a wooden skewer stick over the flame in the lamp, while vertically placing you kōgai in front of the flame. Forming a cross formation, the light from the lamp will be blocked, giving the impression that you are going to sleep. This is the method for “kōgai-gakure”.
If your suspicions are correct, and thieves and the like sneak into your room, you can pull your kōgai away to light up the room in an instance, exposing your perpetrators.
COMMENT: Interesting tricks like this can be found in some war documents. While they sound pretty cool, in many cases they are very situational, and tend to be missing additional information.
#7: Using a kōgai as chopsticks (箸に用いる使い方) When your group has set up camp and are about to eat, you can use your kōgai as chopsticks when proper ones are not available. You can also use the kōgai to skewer pickled items.
COMMENT: While a kōgai was generally a solid, singular metallic object, there was another version where it was 2, detachable pieces, which could then double as chopsticks. However, this 2-piece kōgai was devised, from my understanding, much later during Edo period, so it’s abit skeptical that such a version was made beforehand.
CONCLUSION
Researching old documentations on martial/military contents can be both fun and informative. However, it’s best to take the information you read with a grain of salt. Some contents are easier to verify than others, while finding unique/obscure documents doesn’t mean you’ve found a treasure trove. At the end of the day, documents like the one mentioned above make for an interesting read that can be further researched on for further verification, but nothing to announce to the world as top secret strategies you’ve miraculously discovered.
Staying true to the rabbit theme for 2023, here’s another article that is related to the story “White Rabbit of Inaba Country”. The original story, along with analytical tidbits, have been covered already. Now, let’s take a turn in a different direction with it.
As mentioned in a previous article, there are speculations that tales like “The White Rabbit of Inaba Country” are more of a fantastical re-write of true events. I’ve come across a couple of discussions about what those true events could be, but the one that caught my attention the most is one that is fitting of an action film.
Snapshot of the origin story behind the folklore “White Rabbit of Inaba Country”, as it appears on the Hakuto Shrine’s website.
While visiting the website for Hakuto Shrine (the shrine located in Tottori Prefecture where the god that is revered there is indeed the White Rabbit) and viewing the mythology page¹, one can find the story about the White Rabbit that fits the same narrative that most are familiar with straight from the historical source called the Kojiki. However, there is another story below it that is claimed to be a true event that took place centuries ago in Japan.
THE NAVAL BATTLE BETWEEN SHIRO-USAGI AND WANI
This story below was passed down for generations by the chief priests, as they would be the ones to refer to in regards to the real meaning behind the popular folklore. I’ve included the original Japanese text, and beside it my English transliteration.
It is said that the name “shiro usagi” (white rabbit) from the famous book Kojiki was related to a highly prestigious clan that controlled a particular area during the age of folklore, and was not truly referencing an actual rabbit that lived in the wild. This clan was peaceful by nature with their neighbors, similar to actual rabbits, which is the reason why they were nicknamed Shiro-Usagi.
Specializing in sea fare, the Shiro-Usagi clan sailed close to the islands of Oki and engaged in battles against bandits that were terrorizing the coast, who went by the name “Wani”, meaning “Shark”².
During the last battle with the bandits, members of the Shiro-Usagi clan suffered grave injuries. Fortunately, they were rescued by the god known as Ōkuninushi no mikoto³. Later, they worked hand-to-hand with Ōkuninushi no mikoto in order to dispel the Wani force, and bring order to the islands. It’s also said that the Shiro-Usagi clan allowed Ōkuninushi to take Yagami-hime to be his wife.
Here is more information regarding this battle, which is found in the a publication from Tottori Prefecture called “Tottori Shinpō” (鳥取新報), which was issued sometime in November of 1920.
The White Rabbit clan, ruling over the area near Tottori Prefecture, went to battle against the massive force of the Wani at Oki islands.
The Wani were a wild bunch of seafarers who caused havoc around the ocean of Japan.
It is written that the gods of the White Rabbits employed a strategy against the Wani called “Line up the Wani heads, now jump!”. It’s noted that fireworks were used to push the large force of the Wani to be grouped together, which is described as “line up their heads”.
These circumstances of the battle, as written in the Kojiki, is very interesting.
The Wani grand fleet fought the White Rabbits ruthlessly as if they were nothing, as they were pushed from Oki islands all the way to Keta Front. In the end, the Wani bested the Shiro-Usagi, as they were left bloodied from the superior assault from the sea bandits.
Seeing their opponents in their defeated state, the Wani army let out a battle cry, then withdrew from the battle area.
The last sentence written is “As our clothing has been ripped from our backs, this is the last we see of the Wani force”, which is similar to the description of the white rabbit losing his fur in the Kojiki.
Guess we can image that they were beaten near the brink of death, similar to the state in which the divine white rabbit after first reaching Inaba Country.
In the end, the surviving members of the White Rabbit clan recovered, and, with the help from Ōkuninushi no mikoto, chased after the Wani force and defeated them from good, ridding them from the area…or so it’s said.
ANOTHER LAYER TO THE REAL EVENT
If we take the story above as fact, then that means that the folklore from the Kojiki is coded for an actual navel battle between a reputable clan and sea rogues…as so recorded at Hakuto Shrine in Tottori Prefecture. Yet, the story does not end here. Apparently, this naval battle is coded yet again, with the original bearing a much more robust details, and intertwining parties involved.
A map depicting the conflict between the Baekje and Silla in Ancient Korea in the mid-600s. From Wikipedia.
On the blog, “Shinwa wo kagaku suru tanbou“, there is a discussion regarding the naval battle version spoken about above, and how there’s yet another theory about it being a coded tale for an actual historical event. This theory states that this historical event is known as “Battle of Baekgang” (白村江の戦い, reads as “Hakusontou no Tatakai” in Japanese), which is a true event that took place in old Korea in the year 663. Historical data reads this as a civil war between surviving clans of the ancient south-western kingdom of Baekje and their eastern neighbors of Silla. The groups from Baekje were supported by a Japanese force, while those of Silla found support in the form of troops from the Tang Empire of China. This battle took place both on on land & sea, with the masterful naval prowess of the Baekje at the forefront, later supported by the naval crafts of the Japanese. while the Tang Empire did the same for their side.
The naval battle story found in Hakuto Shrine parallels this Battle of Baekgang, with the Shiro-Usagi clan representing Baekje/Japan alliance (ie. the native clansmen), while the Wani force represents the Silla/Tang alliance (ie. the raiders). Of course, this particular event takes place at the end, with much more content found years before. In a similar fashion, the Baekje faced near annihilation at the hands of the rivaling army in their own homeland of Baekje, which first happened in 660. To their saving grace, survivors that fled south were able to find a glimpse of hope by the last Baekje ruler, Prince Buyeo Pung, who at the time found refuge in Japan. As the beaten Baekje warriors recover, and bolster their strength once again, a large Japanese naval fleet was sent out to assist in helping them continue the fight with the Tang army in the former southern city of Ungjin County (located present-day Gongju) on the Korean Peninsula. A few years later, in 663, the Baekje/Japanese force set out for their final battle in southern Baekje with the Tang army in the form of 5 naval face-offs.
As a reminder, this is just speculation for the origins of the “White Rabbit of Inaba Country”. In truth, there is more content regarding the struggle for power between the people of Baekje and Silla that prevents it from being a simple cut-and-paste in the form of a fairy tale, while the outcome found in history is different even the coded version of the tale (hint: the Baekje/Japanese force lost all 5 naval battles, which ended the survivors of Baekje completely). From what I understand, there is no strategy related to “lining up the sharks’ heads” used by the Baekje/Japanese force, although the Japanese naval fleet took the most casualties at the end, which included many of their ships being burned down.
FINAL THOUGHTS
This concludes our look at this wild take on a popular folklore. I’ve only introduced one theoretical take on this, for while there are more, the idea of a naval battle is the most interesting in my opinion. Like anything based on theory, the connection to a war that took place in Korea which the Japanese was also involved in isn’t a perfect one, especially the reasoning why, if the connection is true, it had to be re-written in a folklore that give no indications to the history behind it. Nonetheless, the coded version is pretty wild & exciting with its more pro-nationalistic theme and mythological image that is portrayed.
1) Currently, the website is down. Interestingly, I was able to visit the site a few times this year, but now this is no longer the case.
2) It’s been considered that the ancient use of the Chinese characters “和爾” is a reading for the sea creature “shark”, as well for “crocodile”. To stay consistent with the accepted viewpoints regarding the Kojiki, I will use the shark term.
3) This is another name for Ōkuninushi no kami (大国主神), as used in the articles here and here.
Here is part 2 on the series regarding the folklore “White Rabbit of Inaba Country”, which will cover fun facts, real life comparisons, as well as certain research topics. Although introduced as a folklore to many kids, originally this was held with high esteem as a source of Japan’s origin story, as well as the rights of the Imperial line. Of course, this type of literature was only privy to nobles and influential clans as early as 700s, but was made available to the general public from around the mid 1600s, especially as literature in schools.
Here’s a list of some of the sources used as research material for this article:
Before going forward, it’s worth mentioning again that the story of the white rabbit and his journey to Inaba Country is originally part of a bigger tale regarding Ōkuninushi no kami, and how he becomes the head of the earthly gods, as well as the ruler of the central land in Japan, which is all recited in the Kojiki. While it may seem that the white rabbit plays a minor role, it is in fact the opposite, for he was critical in Ōkuninushi’s rise in status, and can even be argued that he judged Ōkuninushi’s fate. While this, as well as all other stories found in the Kojiki, part of the mythological origin of Japan, it is worth noting that the interpretations aren’t as clear cut as one would assume; reading the clear & easily digestible versions of the folklore (including the one from the previous article) paints an acceptable image of the white rabbit and his journey to Inaba Country, but in reality these are based on adjusted, acceptable interpretations. The original text isn’t as clear with the details, nor the meaning behind some of the dialogue used. These, along with not fully understanding the reasoning behind why the Kojiki was written the way it is, has lead to numerous discussions on the meaning behind much of the text. In the end, researchers have to struggle reading in-between the lines, which in itself can lead to more confusion. Some of these issues will be touched upon lightly in this article.
Another point regarding interpretation challenges leads to the idea about aspects of the folklore being a parallel to real social, and political events that are linked to geographical areas of old. While there may be some truth to this (especially later on in the Kojiki, when the “gods” theme tones down abit and focuses more on actual people), it is still challenged by a lack of concrete, factual evidence. Reasons behind this include certain aspects of the past intentionally hidden due to political issues, which can be remedied through either changing names of certain individuals involved, to replacing with a misdirection in the form of a fantasy-like narrative.
LESSONS FROM THE FOLKLORE
As a folklore geared towards children, what types of lessons are young readers expected to take away from the story “Inaba no Shiro Usagi”? There are 2 lessons that I was able to find.
1) GREAT FORTUNE COMES TO THOSE WHO DO GOOD DEEDS – This one points to Ōkuninushi no kami, and how he was rewarded for his kind nature. Unlike his mean and selfish older siblings, he helped an injured white rabbit heal itself & regain his fur. In turn to his kindness, the white rabbit ensured that it was Ōkuninushi be the one to take Yagami-hime’s hand in marriage.
2) AVOID BRASH ACTIONS, LEST BE GREETED BY DISASTER– This pertains to the white rabbit and how he foiled himself as he crossed along the backs of the sharks to reach Inaba Country. While his wit to have the sharks line up unaware is admirable, getting ahead of himself and making them look stupid by bragging about his trick was his undoing. The white rabbit brought bad luck to himself due to this…which is a poor habit we should avoid.
THE REAL OKI ISLAND AND INABA COUNTRY
The country Inaba, from where the events took place, has been deduced by researchers to be modern-day Shimane, in the eastern part of Tottori Prefecture. Shimane is also part of the area that was once called “Inaba Country” or “Inaba Province”, during ancient times. The land of Inaba is painted as an important location where a goddess named “Yagami-hime” resides. This may not be a coincidence, as there is a bit of a parallel with real life. You see, while most of the events in the Kojiki are considered mythological, this possibly was done intentionally as it covers possibly social structures. In the past, Inaba Country was one of the highest ranking lands in terms of powerful clans, coming second to the capital where the Imperial Palace was located. Inaba Country was also close to the capital at a time, so the clans there served the Imperial family directly. In terms of its geography, Inaba Country sits next to the Sea of Japan, which is important to note for the next part.
A map that details the locations of both Inaba Country and Oki Islands in the past. From Wikipedia.
Looking at Oki Island, where the white rabbit was first introduced, there are a few areas that are thought to be this location. Based on distance, as well as the idea that this is a “lone” island, researchers point to an archipelago in the Sea of Japan called Oki Islands, meaning that it wasn’t a single island. Despite it’s distance in the ocean, it is part of the territory of Shimane Prefecture that is called “Oki District” in modern times. While being one of the many smaller islands off the coast of Japan, Oki Islands was considered its own country, as there are records of inhabitants even during ancient times. This also made these islands suitable for political exile. Speaking of which, The full story of Ōkuninishi has a relatively profound political tone, especially later in his life. Some of it is thought to be parallel to real events between aristocrats, warlords, and the Imperial Palace. Is it possible that the white rabbit, being the only one of his kind on Oki Island, was a representation of a reputable individual who was exiled? Or one who escaped from a bad situation? That is a personal theory of mine, one out of speculation.
WHAT’S IN A TITLE
At 1st glance, the modern title “White Rabbit of Inaba Country” seems to be more straight-forward and staying true to the story. Yet, something is off, as this points to the rabbit being from Inaba Country. Isn’t he originally from Oki island? To be honest, the modern title isn’t as straight forward as one would think when reading the Japanese title, yet it’s one of those minor points that’s not easily obvious. Now, if we compare this with how the older title was written, we then discover it is filled with hidden meanings behind the story. Of course, to understand this would be to analyze and dissect the characters used in the Japanese title.
Here’s variations of the modern title. Note that they are both essentially the same, other than that the word for “white rabbit” (shiro usagi) is either written in modern kanji (Chinese characters) or simpler Japanese phonetic characters called hiragana:
因幡の白兎
因幡のしろうさぎ
Now, here’s what the older title looks like.
稲羽之素兎
Inaba (因幡) is the name of the country where the events took place. In the older title, we see “稲羽” used for the name Inaba instead. Other than small nuances such as character presentation, representation of phonetics, and the like based on the time period, both mean the same thing. However, the real point of interest lies in the theory that the name is thought to have a hidden reading, which is “往ば” or “去ば”. Both are verbs with the conjugation “inaba” pronunciation, and have the meaning “to return” or “go back”. If either is used in the story’s title, it’ll properly read “White Rabbit who’s Returning Home”. This theory isn’t too far-fetched, as in many older Japanese literature there tends to be word play through the use of Chinese characters. Also, the white rabbit’s desire to travel to Inaba Country must mean that he knows something about this area….possibly because he’s been there before?
There is one other point, which is concerning the older title “shiro usagi” and how it does not use a character that actually means white. Instead, there was a theory that it actually references him returning back to normal after facing his ordeals. This will be saved for a more in-depth discussion later in the article.
YAGAMI-HIME = GODDESS
Yagami-hime is whom Ōkuninushi no kami and his 80 sibling gods head to see. Is this also true for the white rabbit? There’s some interesting tidbits regarding her, as well as what she represents.
Yagami is the name of an area in Inaba in the past. Thought to have gotten its name from the actual story, the area of Yagami was fairly large, consisting of 12 towns. Today, it is known as “Yazu District” (八頭郡) in Tottori Prefecture. Having such a historical record as such, it’s possible that Yagami was a place of significance, for it’s even thought that the white rabbit, as well as Ōkuninushi no kami and his siblings, were heading to this very area. In parallel to the regalia of Yagami-hime in the story, the area of Yagami may have been controlled by a noble family. Whether or not this family had a daughter of such significance as demonstrated through Yagami-hime in the story is a mystery. Another thing worth mentioning is that her name can can also be pronounced as “Yakami-hime”.
In terms of her position, since the premise of the folklore centers around gods, Yagami-hime is indeed a goddess. So, it would make sense that other gods would seek her out to take her hand in marriage. What about the white rabbit? What would be his purpose in meeting with her? In the version of the story used in the previous article, it’s written that the white rabbit traveled to Inaba to meet a goddess. Is Yagami-hime whom the white rabbit wanted to meet? This isn’t specified. In fact, this appears to be an addition to this version. Going off of the original story found in the Kojiki, readers only learn of his intentions after Ōkuninushi asks what’s ailing him, which the reply includes his statement about wanting to visit Inaba. In truth, the white rabbit doesn’t mention about a goddess, let alone Yagami-hime. In the end, most likely he only went to see Yagami-hime as a means to help Ōkuninushi no Kami, and foil the 80 sibling gods’ plans.
A snapshot of statues portraying Okuninushi no kami, Yagami-hime, and the white rabbit. The location of this is the Menuma Jinja (賣沼神社), which is in Kawabara Town, Tottori Prefecture. There is a sign to the left stating that this is a place where visitors can pray for love. From Tottori City Tourism.
One more fact to mention is how Yagami-hime and Ōkuninushi no kami’s relationship is considered one Japan’s oldest love story. While this isn’t the only example of a relationship taking place in the Kojiki (nor is it the first one), it is, in a way, appreciated on a romantic level. In true fashion, their relationship did blossom into something special, where they did get married and have a child. Unfortunately, their tale did not have a happy ending, as Ōkuninushi would be forced to leave after an attempt was made to take his life, and would never return back to Yagami-hime.
SHARK VS CROCODILE
In terms of topics pertaining to the story that have no clear resolution, one I’d like to point out in detail concerns the first obstacle for the white rabbit, which are the sharks. Surprisingly, it wasn’t always sharks that were presented in the story, for there was a time when instead the sea creatures that cost the white rabbit’s fur were described as crocodiles. The reasoning behind this has to do with the naming convention used during ancient times, and the confusion that comes with it due to inconsistencies in geographical inhabitancy, as well as changes in the Japanese language in modern times.
First, let’s look at the name used in the story. The creatures deceived by the white rabbit are called “wani” in Japanese, which are represented by the Chinese characters “和爾”. Verbally, wani means “crocodile” or “alligator”. So one would assume that crocodiles were the correct sea creatures that were the obstacle in the story. There are a couple of issues with this, the biggest deals with when the story (and as a whole, the Kojiki) was written. It dates back around the 700s, which around this time, crocodiles were not a creature naturally inhabiting Japan. Furthermore, the event with the white rabbit took place out in the sea, where crocodiles would not be at for they are reptiles and not sea creatures. Although they are active in water, crocodiles are generally found closer to land. Sharks, on the other hand, are a type of sea creature that are fish and can be found out in the ocean, which better fits the narrative.
The covers of 2 different books, each depicting the scene where the white rabbit crosses the sea. The left one featuring sharks, while the one on the right has crocodiles.
So why use the term wani for a sea creature? There are some theories behind this. One is that the Japanese had knowledge of crocodiles from their interactions with other Asian countries, such as China and, for the sake of fantasy, added them into the story. This isn’t too far-fetch, especially when you consider how many artworks incorporate tigers, which are also not natural to Japan. In fact, this is a pretty strong one, as there are other cases of the word wani appearing in other Japanese folklore, which was used for dragon-like or snake-like reptilian creatures. On the other hand, one thought is that the word wani was used as a label for multiple creatures in ancient times, and not just for reptilian ones such as crocodiles; there is evidence that the name may have been attached to other sea creatures as far back as when the Kojiki was written, which includes fugu (河豚, puffer fish) and same (鮫, shark) . This isn’t too unusual; in fact, this practice is still used today in certain parts of Japan, as apparently the word wani is associated to sharks. This is similar to the difference in pig/boar labeling in Japan when compared to China.
At the end of the day, there is no concrete answer to whether it’s a crocodile or a shark that appears in the story. In current times, the shark theory is more accepted, and is in the majority of versions and art depictions of the story. In fact, to distinguish from crocodiles, the common practice is to use the unique title of “wani-zame” (鰐鮫) for these sharks.
MIRACLE CATTAIL
The cattail, called “gama no hana” (蒲の花) in Japanese, plays a symbolic role for bringing back the white rabbit’s fur. Or, it can be though that it replaces the lost fur completely. For those who are unfamiliar (like myself), a cattail reed has spiky seeds all over it. When ready, these same seed bloom into fluffy cotton. In reality, the cattail is a multi-purpose plant that has been relied on for generations, as it can be used for making utilitarian supplies such as hats & baskets, it can be used for culinary purposes, as well as for medicinal purposes. Quite amazing is how the cotton from the seeds can be used as stuffing and insulation, which is probably where the idea of rubbing a cattail along the white rabbit’s body had the seeds stick to him in order to bloom into a new white coat of fur came from.
Outside of this playfully creative remedy in a folklore, cattail does have actual medicinal usages in Japan in the past, as it is said there are some archaic remedies found in old documentations. One usage was for resolving certain pain-related issues, possibly through boiling or burning down certain parts into some form of concoction. Another medical usage was for bleeding issues, where the cotton from the seeds were probably used to cover up cuts. Speaking of which, there is the idea that the cattail was actually used for the purpose of relieving the white rabbit’s pain and not for regaining his white fur. Could it be that the cotton from the cattail was actually used to cover up and heal his lacerated skin? While this aligns with actual medical purposes, this idea is not incorporated in most (if any) interpretations of the folklore.
We’ll stop here, as this quip about cattails is a small piece of a much bigger conversation that will be covered more in depth in the following paragraphs below.
ORIGINS OF THE WHITE RABBIT
Pinpointing where the white rabbit comes from is one with no clear answer. Exploring the origin would be a fruitless endeavor, as there are no concrete methods to uncover this. On the other hand, we can look into some fun facts regarding the character used to identify him, as well as the idea of him crossing the sea.
For linguistic buffs, it’s interesting to know that the white rabbit was identified by a different Chinese character. Normally, “兎” is the character that represents rabbits, but in the Kojiki there is a unique variation for this word, which is “菟”. The difference between both characters is the top part of the character, which means “grass”. This is an old character not used in modern Japanese, but is though to be the original character used to identify rabbits. One can say that the old character describes rabbits better, as they do live out in fields and eat vegetation to survive.
The idea of a rabbit crossing the ocean on the backs of sharks is quite unique, but not necessarily the sole example of such story telling. There are other such tales in older Asian lore where animals, such as foxes and small deer, have to cross the sea using various modes of transportation. It’s possible that the author of Kojiki was inspired by other Asian lore from other countries, and incorporated this theme. But why? On another note, what does this tell us about the white rabbit? Was he native to Oki Island, or did he somehow get stranded over there? Does that mean that he’s originally from Inaba? Also, what was the reason to traveling to Oki Island? Could his travel have been a reflection of political conflict? Is the white rabbit a parallel of an important individual sent to Oki Island? Questions like these probably won’t be answered anytime soon. Interestingly, there was a work of literary art produced generations later that expands on the origins of the white rabbit with a unique spin, adding reasoning behind his journey. Since it is out of scope with this article, it won’t be discussed here, but I intend to go in depth about it in another article.
BEHIND THE “WHITE” FUR
In the modern adaption of the story, the protagonist is called “shiro usagi”, which is white rabbit in English, and this name is represented by the characters “白兎”. However, note that this differs from the original text, which includes the point that the color of his fur was never mentioned before he lost his fur. In the Kojiki, he is not called “white rabbit”. Instead, simply the term “rabbit” is used to address him, along with other terms based on the changes of his situation, such as naked rabbit (裸の兎) from when he lost his fur, and rabbit god (兎神) after he elevates to the status of a deity. The name of the book “Inaba no Shiro Usagi” is taken directly from the following line in the Kojiki upon regaining his fur after following Ōkuninushi’s remedy:
JAPANESE: 此稻羽之素菟者也 TRANS: He’s become the “white” rabbit of Inaba
Here we have rabbits that have brownish-to-beige-hue fur (left) during the warm seasons, while a white fur rabbit (right) sits in the snow during winter. Could there be any significance to the white rabbit having white fur in the folklore outside of wintertime?From Photo AC.
Although here the word “shiro” is used, which normally stands for white in Japanese through the character “白”, in the Kojiki a different character is used. This particular character for shiro is “素”, which has a meaning that leans toward “clean”, “unstained”, or “original”. An Edo period scholar Motoori Norinaga (1730 ~ 1801) reasoned that the reading of this character can be white through the same meaning. His reasoning has often been compared to how non-dyed clothing or fabric is often white, and is represented by the characters “素布”. Interestingly, the pronunciation shiro is uncommon for the character “素”, but could be a case where it’s used to represent the idea of “white”, thus allowing readers to understand that the rabbit does indeed have white fur.
On another train of thought, some of the descriptions geared towards the white rabbit is more “human-like”, as opposed to how other animals in the Kojiki are described. For example, when the white rabbit loses its fur, it is called the “naked rabbit”. The characters used for naked feels more of what you’d say to a person, as it has the nuance of meaning “being clothe-less and having a reddish hue”, similar to that of a new born baby. Some thoughts about the white fur likens it to clothing, such as him putting on a white robe. This could be because the white rabbit turned into a deity that is revered today, thus encouraging the words that describe him to be more respectful.
REAL PURPOSE OF ŌKUNINUSHI’S REMEDY
The most problematic conversation regarding the meaning behind “white” is regarding Ōkuninushi’s remedy, and what it truly was intended for in the original text. If we examine the white rabbit’s condition in the story, he was more than just fur-less, but was wind-burnt and lacerated from the 80 sibling gods’ prank. Seeing the injured body, Ōkuninushi’s remedy of using clean water and the cotton from cattail seeds may have only been to treat the cuts sustained and heal the body, for his intentions were to return the rabbit back to his “normal” state. Following this concept, the use of the word shiro (素) may have actually been speaking towards this, and not actually getting a white (白) fur back, if he even had one from the start.
While the application of medical treatment in the form of a remedy makes perfect sense, it does detract from a story that deals with individuals that are beyond normal. In fact, it takes away from the surreal nature that the narrative hints towards, not just in the “Inaba no Shiro Usagi” story, but from the Kojiki as a whole. It’s possible that the consensus found this “normal” medical idea distasteful; there are plenty of criticisms in the unclear and segmented narrative used in the Kojiki and its whole “gods” theme, which spurred many concepts such as this one in hopes to being the “missing” piece to solve the puzzle. In truth, reading the older, non-restructured version of “Inaba no Shiro Usagi” (as well as Kojiki as a whole) can be a chore trying to interpret, as the descriptions are not very fleshed out, which can lead to a lot of misunderstandings. Thus, with this idea ruled out, future interpretations steered toward the notion that the character “素” refers to “white”, and incorporated the vivid imagery of a rabbit with white fur losing it, then regaining it through Ōkuninushi’s remedy.
WORSHIPING THE RABBIT DEITY
There’s no argument that “Inaba no Shiro Usagi” has had an influence on Japanese society. With the likeable image of the white rabbit, it is not surprising to see rabbits play a star role in future stories, traditions, and pop culture. One of the more substantial result of this can be seen in the number of shrines and temples built in honor of rabbits, or that have a rabbit motif somewhere in their structure.
The most well-known shrine that is directly correlated with the iconic folklore is “Hakuto Jinja” (白兎神社), or “White Rabbit Shrine” in English. This is located in Tottori City, Tottori Prefecture, the origin land of the folklore itself. This shrine was built generations later, Here, people revere the same white rabbit as “Hakuto-kami” (白兎神), and pray to receive aid for various situations, such as the following:
Images of Hakuto Jinja, which includes the main shrine hall (left), the torii gate (middle), and statues depicting the white rabbit and Ōkuninushi no kami (right). From Photo AC.
Curing skin disease
Healing from injuries
Recover from various illnesses
Animal Healthcare
Fate
Marriage
All these are related to the folklore one way or the other, especially the last one. In “Inaba no Shiro Usagi”, the deity white rabbit displayed the unique ability to affect the fate of specific individuals, or people of special existence. As such, we see how remarkable he was as the go-between in sealing the fate between Yagami-hime and Ōkuninushi. Thus, why lovers would come to the Hakuto Jinja and pray for a successful marriage.
CONCLUSION
Here comes the end to this article. This became a much longer one than anticipated due to finding a lot of interesting information. This is also a testament on the importance of “Inaba no Shiro Usagi” in Japanese culture as a whole. There are other interesting concepts based on this folklore, which are currently planned as separate articles to be shared on this blog later this year.
In accordance to this year’s Zodiac animal theme, I’ve looked into stories from Japanese folklore that deals with a rabbit and its inspiring traits. I’ve decided to go with a classic known as “Inaba no Shiro Usagi” (因幡の白兎, White Rabbit of Inaba Country), one that is found in one of Japan’s oldest literature named “Kojiki” (古事記) . While deemed on the mythological side, the Kojiki is a valuable source that is tied to the Imperial line and is integral to Japanese culture, as some aspects of it is thought to tell of real-life social events, albeit coded. As for Inaba no Shiro Usagi, originally it is not a stand-alone tale in the Kojiki, but has since been sectioned out to act as a folktale for little kids since modern times. While it is a simple tale about a white rabbit’s journey, take note that it is driven by past spiritual and superstitious views & beliefs, so there are a bit of hidden lessons to be found, which some will be covered in a follow-up article.
Image of a rabbit jumping, an essential skill used in the story “Inaba no Shiro Usagi”. From Illust-AC.
The original text found in the Kojiki is written in very old Chinese-structured Japanese, which makes it a challenge to read even for native speakers. Plus, the writing was much shorter and concise. Fortunately, there are numerous publications of Inaba no Shiro Usagi that feature updated, easy-to-read Japanese text that are also fleshed out to capture the full picture of the events in the story, which expands it a good deal. The version that will be used for this article comes from the following site.
A long time ago, there was a single white rabbit on an island called Oki. He wanted to go to Inaba Country, for he wanted to meet the Goddess there. However, he had no means to do this, for there was a vast sea between Oki island and Inaba Country.
As a resolution to his situation, the white rabbit had an idea about tricking some sharks and using them to cross the sea. He called out to a shark and proposed the following,
“Hey shark, let’s compare who has more companions, me or you.”
The white rabbit then had the sharks line up all the way to Inaba Country, and was able to cross the sea by jumping nimby along the top of their backs.
Brimming with happiness, the white rabbit blurted this out just as he was about to arrive on the coast of Inaba Country. Infuriated, one of the sharks grabbed hold of the white rabbit’s fur with its teeth and pulled it right off, leaving him hairless.
The hairless white rabbit was in such pain from this, as he was left crying in the sand. Just then, a large mass of gods, who were the 80 sibling gods of Ōkuninushi no kami (大国主命), came walking by. Similar to the rabbit, they too traveled to Inaba from a neighboring country after hearing about the unrivaled beauty of a princes named Yagami-hime (八上姫), with their intention being that one of them succeeds in taking her hand and making her their wife. Hearing the plight of the sobbing rabbit, the sibling gods, half-interested, shared with him the following.
“To cure your ailment, wash your body in sea water, then allow your body to be blown-dry in the wind, and finally sleep at the top of a mountain.”
As instructed, the rabbit drenched his body in sea water, and blow-dried his skin in the wind. However, he was unaware that this remedy was all but a lie, for with each step in this painful process, the more it became extremely excruciating to bear.
A creative interpretation Ōkuninushi no kami holding a cattail reed, which is key to the hairless white rabbit regaining its white fur back. From Illust-AC.
As the white rabbit sat crying once again due to this extreme pain, a god by the name of Ōkuninushi no kami walked by, carrying a large baggage that contain the personal items of the sibling gods. He was a good distance from the sibling gods, as he followed behind the group at a slow pace. Ōkuninushi inquired the weeping white rabbit the cause of his plight, and listened to all that had transpired.
“Please go wash your body in fresh water at the mouth of the river, then rub the furry fruiting spikes of the cattail reeds all over your body.”
Ōkuninushi gave the white rabbit advice on how to solve his situation.
The white rabbit did as he was told, and sure enough his body once again was covered in fur. In return, the white rabbit, elated with joy, had this to say to Ōkuninushi,
“Mean-spirited guys like your brother gods will never be able to take Princess Yagami-hime as a wife. Instead, she should choose you.”
With that, the white rabbit transformed into a messenger god, and was able to quickly travel to Yagami-hime & inform her the situation before the sibling gods reached her place.
Unaware of what the white rabbit had done, the sibling gods gathered in front of the princess, and they all asked for her hand in marriage. With no hesitation, the princess responded to the request.
“I offer my hand in marriage to Ōkuninushi no kami, and not to any of you.”
In saying this, she sent the sibling gods out from her presence.
It can be said that through Ōkuninushi no kami’s kindness, and coupled with his unique trait of catching the heart of a woman, that this is how his journey was able to come to an end.
Page containing the tale “Inaba no Shiro Usagi”, from a copy of Kojiki in its original writing. From NDL Digital Collections.
This is how the story Inaba no Shiro Usagi ends. As mentioned before, this tale is a small part of a bigger story surrounding Ōkuninushi no kami’s journey. Still, in a short narrative we see a white rabbit use its cleverness & speed to accomplish a difficult task, as well as transform into a godly creature to repay another for his kindness. Stay tuned for part 2, which will be an in-dept analysis of the story and its unspoken meanings, as well as some back story in its interpretation over the years.
