Kenjutsu through 3 different swords

The word “kenjutsu” normally stirs up the idea of training in Japanese-style swordsmanship with the standard katana. In truth, this is more of a modern labeling. During Japan’s history of medieval warfare, the idea of kenjutsu was not limited to a sword of one size. This idea is retained in kobudō, and is put into practice in specified types of lessons, which is also upheld by our Chikushin group.

It is not impossible to apply the techniques of kenjutsu which incorporates a sword of specific length to, say, a sword of a longer length. In fact, it’s this same concept that was applied in the past (along with trial & error from experience), which can give birth to legitimate systems, such as kodachijutsu. This lies in the establishment of solid fundamentals that transpire in the multitiude of weapons one can learn in kobudō.

Some Japanese martial schools that possess various disciplines with different types of bladed weapons, each bearing a clear curriculum of skills, may be called a sōgō bujutsu (総合武術). There may be other non-curriculum content, such as sotowaza (外技), or skills that come from other martial systems not part of the current martial school’s philosophy¹, but in turn offer unique skills that prove beneficial. It’s from factors like these in which one can learn kenjutsu that can transpire across bladed weapons of varying designs.

In this article, I will demonstrate the similarities and differences in kenjutsu based on 3 types of bladed weapons, as well as the neccessity of understanding these finer points in order to use each one effectively. This demonstration encompasses fundamental skills that each of the weapons presented below share.

DIMENSIONS

Presented here are 3 bladed weapons, each of a different type that serves different roles: long sword, standard sword, and short sword.

LONG SWORD (NAGAMAKI): The first is a nagamaki. For starters, this features a 34″ blade, which is longer than the standard katana length of 27″. Along with that is an enlongated handle of 38″, giving the wielder a great reach advantage. A battlefield weapon that was once very devastating, whether on foot or while on horseback.

STANDARD SWORD (KATANA): Next is a katana, the common representation of Japanese sword. This one features a 28″ blade and 11″ handle. The katana accounts for much of what martial artists train with when studying kenjutsu. It’s not only crucial to be adept at using one, but also how to defend against it, since many weapon systems use lessons where one goes against an opponent who wields a katana.

SHORT SWORD (TANTŌ): Lastly is a tantō, coming in with a 10 1/2″ blade and 5″ handle. A bladed weapon that makes a good pair with a katana, but wouldn’t have been the 1st choice for use in combat. Still, it makes for a handy improvision when a bigger weapon isn’t readily available, especially since it’s common for people to carry something similar nowadays.

While the differences between the 3 weapons look daunting, a person can learn how to adapt the concepts of kenjutsu through dedicated practice. For example, while the katana features a common two-handed handle size, the nagamaki is unique as it can be utilized through techniques of both the katana and naginata due to its longer blade and handle. On the other hand, many Japanese martial school teach using a shorter sword against a standard one, allowing one to understand the principles of kenjutsu while wielding a tantō, along with developing dexterity in one’s movements to compensate for its short length.

The following scenarios below uses elements from the kenjutsu of Kukishin ryū to demonstrate how they apply to each weapon, despite their apparent differences. Note that, while Kukishin ryū has specific skillsets for each of these weapons, I will not be going in dept and comparing them to each other. The purpose of this overview is to analyze and compare the overall usage of each in specified situations.

#1 KAMAE – IKIYŌI (SEIGAN)

Here we take up a standard position of readiness, which most know as Seigan (正眼). According to each weapon, how this posture appears will be different, although the intention is the same.

NAGAMAKI – Much easier to control distance with the longer blade. On top of this, one can intimidate and take initiative through the additional handle length. This is achieved through te no uchi (手の内), or how one manipulates the nagamaki using different hand placements.

KATANA – Maintaining a moderate distance, we can keep a proper form. Through skills, one can be ready to either attack or defend when the opportunity arises. Those familiar with kendō can grasp this idea quickly.

TANTŌ – Extend arm to protect oneself and effectively anticipate an attack. Although your arm is more vulnerable this way, one can retract or adjust rather quickly due to a tantō’s light weight and balance point.

#2 KATA – TSUKE KOMI

Next, let’s see all three weapons in action. I will use the following kata, called “Tsuke komi” (附込), in where the main point centers on the defender using a thrust attack to close the distance and defeat an opponent who is open as they raise their own sword over their head. Going solely based on appearance, this kata illustrates the advantages and needed adjustments when performing a thrusting attack through each of the three weapons against an opponent who wields a katana.

NAGAMAKI – At any movement, the opponent is at risk of an uncontested thrust. We can also increase our advantange based on our hand placement on the long handle.

KATANA – Sharing similar reach with the opponent, you crouch down and thrust when a clear opening is made. Timing is still necessary to avoid aiuchi (相打ち, mutual strike that could lead to both killing each other), so speed and placement play an important part here.

TANTŌ – Wielding a shorter weapon, the opponent may be more willing to take the initiative and strike first. In most cases, you intercept with your free hand to neutralize their weapon, while simultaneously stabbing.

#3 UKEGATA – UKEKIRI

For this last scenario, we analyze how to beat an opponent’s overhead sword cut with a strong ukekiri (受け斬り), or cutting-like receive. The timing for this is to wait abit after the opponent commits with their attack, then move accordingly with a strong defense. The key here also lies in the footwork, where for each weapon the right foot is back. The ukekiri we deliver is possible based on how we step with the right foot.

NAGAMAKI – Maintain distance as you take a large swing and cut the attack away, while centering your body behind your weapon. Although slower, the impact from the nagamaki can plow through your opponent’s weapon when well-timed. We don’t extend our arms completely for this in order to maintain center control and balance.

KATANA – As you both move into striking distance, match your sword swing and body movement simultaneously to cut away the attack. You can extend arms abit to apply more power.

TANTŌ – Due to its short length, we step out of the path of the attack and cut into the opponent’s own sword from the side to knock it away. Turn your body sideways with the cut to generate maximum power.

ENDING

Here concludes this demonstration of how to weapons of different lengths can be compared in specified scenarios in order to adapt each one to be effective. This form of learning is but one of many in which practitioners at the Chikushin group can experience.


1) One common reason is the skills come from a certain martial style in which the teacher may not have proper licensing to openly teach. Another is they come from scrolls, being deciphered in its entirety but incorporating a teacher’s knowledge in their current martial systems to fill the gaps.

Analyitcal Review of the Nakamaki & Nagamaki

A few years ago I wrote an article for the previous dojo I was in about a Japanese weapon called the nagamaki. This article was to help support the training theme for that year. Since then I continued to do research on it, which also went in the direction of learning more about the nodachi (the roots of the nagamaki), as well as the nakamaki (predecessor to the nagamaki). For my blog, I would like to share the progression of my research and focus this post on both the nakamaki and nagamaki.

BEGINS WITH NODACHI

Taking a brief look into Japanese history, the birth of the nagamaki was around the late Kamakura period (1185-1333) to early Muromachi period (1338–1573). With the Ashikaga clan in power, new methods of warfare were being implemented. Soldiers and warriors alike began to take pride in very long-bladed swords called nodachi (野太刀), or also known as ōdachi (大太刀). These swords had an appeal over the regular tachi due to their superior length and reach.While those with strong arms were able to wield these long swords, in the long run they proved difficult to utilize properly due the imbalance in weight distribution between the blade and handle. To rectify this, the swords went under different modifications. One route had their regular-sized handles replaced by longer handles, and from the sword guards up to the midpoint of the swordblade was leather or silk wrapped, which had these swords labeled as nakamaki (中巻).

Despite the improvements, such as added support of bearing the weight with one’s hand on the wrapping, the nakamaki did not fully meet the expectations desired. With considerations on a way that did not sacrifice efficient use, yet another design was put into motion. Taking these same long swords, their handles were replaced with even longer length handles, while leather or silk was wrapped around the middle of these long handles as added support. This change gave these particular swords the label nagamaki (長巻).

Illustrations of nodachi (top), nakamaki (middle), and nagamaki (bottom). From the book “Ketteihan Zusetsu – Nihonbuki Shūsei “(決定版図説・日本武器集成).

NAKAMAKI SPECIFICS

A long sword with a longer than normal tsuka (handle) with fabric wrapping from the middle of the blade down. Note that “nakamaki” is a shorthand name. The full name is said to be “nakamaki nodachi”, as these are still nodachi (or otherwise called ōdachi).

The wrappings around the blade for the nakamaki allowed a warrior to hold there for better balance. A means to make the nodachi/ōdachi more manageable, one would think that techniques for long swords would apply here. Fortunately, koryu bujutsu schools such as Koden Enshin ryu (古伝圓心流) and Jigen ryu (示現流) have demonstrated publicly their use of such long swords, which can easily be viewed online. Whereas in Enshin ryu the drawing of, as well as the manner for cutting with, the ōdachi is displayed, in Jigen ryu it is shown in simpler usages, such as enhancing the training of kenjutsu. There may be more to the nodachi/ōdachi for each of these schools, so we do have to keep an open-mind for more that is not shown.

As for the nakamaki, one example that is very informative comes from the Shunpukan dojo, which is a Shinkage ryu branch (新陰流) of the Kanbe line. This particular branch has kata for ōdachi. Surprisingly, the ōdachi also incorporates wrapping on the blade. This appears to be similar, if not the same, to a nakamaki.

With the wrapping around the blade, a warrior can safely manipulate a nakamaki as the weight is better distributed. Note that while this is a necessity here, it is not unusual to do the same even for a shorter length sword. In numerous kenjutsu and battō/iai styles, there are techniques such as where a practitioner places one hand (usually the left hand) on the back of their sword in order to assist in thrusting the sword forward like a yari (spear), or to block & push away an oncoming sword cut as if handling it like a bō. In fact, in some kenjutsu schools this method is called “kenbō” (剣棒).

NAGAMAKI SPECIFICS

A nagamaki is a long sword fitted with an extremely long tsuka, which has leather or silk wrapped around the center of the tsuka. Note that nagamaki is a shorthand name, for the full name of this is recorded as “nagamaki koshirae no nodachi”, and “nagamaki nodachi”. Much like the nakamaki, the nagamaki is categorized as a sword.

The handle of the nagamaki is the same as that for a normal katana, as it is designed in a similar fashion, only longer. There are cases of the handle being slightly curved (reminiscent of past battlefield swords’ curved handle) or straight. The te no uchi (or method of handling in English) for the nagamaki is said to be the same as that for the katana, where the right hand is on top and there is no switching from right to left like a bō. That being said, this doesn’t mean that the nagamaki doesn’t have any unique traits of its own; with the added handle length the nagamaki gains additional usages similar to polearms, such as larger sweeping motion similar to a naginata. This is key to remember.

A screen capture of tameshigiri demonstration with the nagamaki of Enryū (圓流). To see the full vid, click on the link here.

Koryu bujutsu schools that have techniques for the nagamaki are few. While it would make sense for nagamaki training to match that of kenjutsu, from my research and personal experience, it tends to parallel that of naginatajutsu. Why is this? There is an interesting relationship between the nagamaki and the naginata, which will be touched upon in the next paragraph.

NAGINATA OR NAGAMAKI?

The naginata (薙刀), Japan’s version of a glaive, was in use around the Heian period. This was distinguished as a polearm, or naga-e (長柄) in Japanese. There are quite some comparisons to the nagamaki. In reality they are not the same, yet it appears the line blurs due to how some koryu bujutsu schools retain their unique knowledge.

Pic of my nagamaki and naginata, for comparison.

By design, the difference between the 2 weapons are as follow:

NAGINATA

  • has a longer shaft, as a polearm
  • features a shorter blade
  • more defined curve in the blade, and is more wider
  • has a tachiuchi (metal wires wrapped under tsuba)
  • bottom end is an ishizuki (metal piece at the end of the shaft)

NAGAMAKI

  • has a long handle, as a sword
  • features a longer blade
  • blade has a slight curve and is slimmer
  • Definitions of the blade match that of a normal sword
  • handle is wrapped tsuka ito (sword handle wrap), along with wrappings around the center for support

Despite these obvious differences, koryu bujutsu schools seem to have not only adopt, but maintain the concept of training the nagamaki like a polearm.

For example, in an older document called “Heihōyōmu Budōzukai Hiketsu” (兵法要務武道図解秘訣), there is a section that has techniques for the nagamaki from Jiki Shinkage ryū (直心影流). However, from reading the descriptions the words “naginata” and “nagamaki” are interchanged a good number of times. Also the diagrams shown a weapon more closer to the naginata in design. Based on my opinion, it sounds as if nagamaki is another name for naginata…or they share the same techniques. In another example, Kukishinden ryū (九鬼神伝流) has techniques for the nagamaki, which I have studied. Design is similar to what one would expect, although the blade is also very wide and heavy, which dictates the use of its weight and gravity. Te no uchi is the same as with the katana, although the techniques are abit different from that found in kenjutsu and naginatajutsu.

The beginning of the section on nagamaki/naginata of Jiki Shinkage ryū.

Yet another example can be found on the website of “Tenshinden Jigen ryu Heiho” (天真伝自原流兵法). Along with this school’s descriptions on the weapons taught, there is a description regarding the nagamaki. Here’s the original Japanese text, followed by my translation in English.

———-

「長巻術は、一般的には知られていないようですが、戦国時代には、槍と同様に良く使用された武器術です。

柄の長さが三尺、刀身が三尺の構成で仕組みが作られており、非常に有効な武器であり、これも、薙刀と同一の技術で組み立てられています。」

“Although not commonly known, the nagamaki is a style of weapon well utilized similarly to how the yari was during the Sengoku period.”

The nagamaki is a very effective weapon, as it is designed with the dimensions of the tsuka (handle) being sanshaku (around 3 feet), and the blade length being sanshaku (around 3 feet). It is also systematized with techniques that are identical to those of the naginata.”

———-

Could this be the case of adopting the name nagamaki for naginata in later years? Or could it be that the nagamaki, or at least the concept of it, was further refined where it became a long blade on a shorter shaft, and developed from the techniques of the naginata? As the martial arts evolved in Japan especially from Edo period onward, this could very well be the case. From a perspective of practicality, the nagamaki of old (i.e. featuring a long handle) is similar to the naginata in terms of length and concept of design. With the added reach, one can logically utilize naginatajutsu with it.

Understanding this point, it is not difficult to see the similarities in these 2 weapons.

PERSONAL ANALYSIS

Studying the development of martial systems in Japanese history, along with how technical skills & formal structuring of martial schools came about, one can understand that there was a methodical approach to using the nakamaki and nagamaki, but not as systematically developed as other weapon systems. One reason being is there was not much time to do so with the civil unrest that lead to constant warring when they saw usage on the battlefield. On top of this, these two variants of long swords were both short lived as their worth on the battlefield could not match other weapons that outperformed them in the long run, such as the yari (spear), uchigatana (close-range battlefield sword), and teppo (guns & rifles).

As far as koryu bujutsu schools that have nodachi as part of their tradition, it appears that some possess specific techniques, while others may use it as a supplement to their normal kenjutsu training. Techniques for the nakamaki seem to be far & few, while the nagamaki has been retained yet modified in some schools, if not just conceptually.

ENDING

We’ve come to a close on this analytical discussion on the nakamaki and nagamaki. What is written is all based on my own research, training experience, and what I was told by certain instructors over the years. While it helps to give a somewhat clearer picture, I’ve learned that there are still varying opinions and viewpoints regarding this topic even in Japan, so nothing is quite written in stone.